A 4g63 Civic
#21
RE: A 4g63 Civic
ORIGINAL: Sebba
Of course not a bolt in swap, but&\\;nbsp\\;I highly doubt he had a shop do it.
Of course not a bolt in swap, but&\\;nbsp\\;I highly doubt he had a shop do it.
ORIGINAL: EMonz57
It was a shop that did it.\\; I think he owns the shop or something.\\; It does say some shop name on there.
It was a shop that did it.\\; I think he owns the shop or something.\\; It does say some shop name on there.
#22
RE: A 4g63 Civic
normally id agree with mike on this kinda thing, but i gotta go with sebba here. that thing is a sleeper and a half. i would definately drive one of those especially if it had a 4g swap. i think it needs to be a built motor runnin like 30 psi, but its still a good idea imo
#24
RE: A 4g63 Civic
i just hate CRX's just opinion. it is fast, but id never drive it. one of the fastest cars out here is a GT500 and theres a CRX that kept up with it better then most cars out here but its because it was all stripped. just had half a dash and a seat with carbon fiber almost everything. damn thing probably weighs 1000lbs haha with a lot of engine mods with a turbo, and the gt500 had a couple bolt ons and a tune.
#25
RE: A 4g63 Civic
I honestly expected a little better out of a CRX with a g63 swap. And I agree with the motor mod vs. N2O thing, you'll get more reliable power out of quality modifications than you will out of a shot of nitrous. And what moron goes through the trouble of frankeinsteining a Mitsubishi motor into a roached out Honda, then throws a 120 shot on it when the motor is bone stock? Sounds like someone needs to put down the F&F movies and do some thinking on their own. On the whole, quick car, resepectable times, but not my cup o tea.
#26
RE: A 4g63 Civic
Sebba's right....no need to hate on a fast car just because its a honda. I had a Civic hatch that was pretty quick and thats why I drove it, got offered an Eclipse so I traded for it. Hating it because its a Honda is like muscle guys hating Mits because its not a Ford or Chev....which is gay.
#28
RE: A 4g63 Civic
I was not hating on it being a honda. I was hating on the stupid fact that a crx can run just as fast or faster than this car did without spending the $$$$ to swap a mitsu motor in. I have seen crxs in person running low 11s at the track. they had no mitsu motor in them lol. that is ok to me (not my choice as they are ugly as ****) but putting a mitsu motor in is a joke. and the car is no sleeper. I dont get how anyone would say that. its like saying hey that Evo has a black pained FMIC that car is a sleeper lol
#29
RE: A 4g63 Civic
ORIGINAL: EMonz57
I was not hating on it being a honda. I was hating on the stupid fact that a crx can run just as fast or faster than this car did without spending the $$$$ to swap a mitsu motor in. I have seen crxs in person running low 11s at the track. they had no mitsu motor in them lol. that is ok to me (not my choice as they are ugly as ****) but putting a mitsu motor in is a joke. and the car is no sleeper. I dont get how anyone would say that. its like saying hey that Evo has a black pained FMIC that car is a sleeper lol
I was not hating on it being a honda. I was hating on the stupid fact that a crx can run just as fast or faster than this car did without spending the $$$$ to swap a mitsu motor in. I have seen crxs in person running low 11s at the track. they had no mitsu motor in them lol. that is ok to me (not my choice as they are ugly as ****) but putting a mitsu motor in is a joke. and the car is no sleeper. I dont get how anyone would say that. its like saying hey that Evo has a black pained FMIC that car is a sleeper lol
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dansevo
For Sale / Trade
3
09-29-2005 03:25 AM
captain_kickass
Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Sportback
9
06-10-2004 06:54 PM