2000 Mitisubishi Eclipse GT Want It All Motor
#11
03-23-2007, 11:50 PM
RE: 2000 Mitisubishi Eclipse GT Want It All Motor
ORIGINAL: Wingo171
Actually, non FI in the GT motor of a 2000 is capable of pushing close *not as efficiently as a turbo* to the same power if compared to a small turbo. A lightened flywheel, performance clutch, cat back exhaust, CAI w/Performance intake manifold+TB, Headers, Fuel Injectors, Fuel Pump, Spark plugs+Spark Cables. I have done research and debated both, the main reason I prefer turbo is you can get bettergas mileage on your car if you want to by not using the boost but rather letting the TC condense your air and cool it off for ya while reusing any unburned fuel that is emitted as exhaust, and you can use a TC with Stock internals and push it's limits or Build the internals and crank up the PSI to exceed and pretty well double the stock Horse.
Actually, non FI in the GT motor of a 2000 is capable of pushing close *not as efficiently as a turbo* to the same power if compared to a small turbo. A lightened flywheel, performance clutch, cat back exhaust, CAI w/Performance intake manifold+TB, Headers, Fuel Injectors, Fuel Pump, Spark plugs+Spark Cables. I have done research and debated both, the main reason I prefer turbo is you can get bettergas mileage on your car if you want to by not using the boost but rather letting the TC condense your air and cool it off for ya while reusing any unburned fuel that is emitted as exhaust, and you can use a TC with Stock internals and push it's limits or Build the internals and crank up the PSI to exceed and pretty well double the stock Horse.
#12
03-24-2007, 03:46 AM
RE: 2000 Mitisubishi Eclipse GT Want It All Motor
man even though i dont have a turbo yet i still know you wont get out of the 13-14 range without it i plan on puttin a 4g63t in mine but ya never mention the turbos are for pussies thing again it doesnt matter how mutch money you put into your car without a turbo even a fwd stock turbo will still beat you like a drum
#13
03-24-2007, 04:05 AM
RE: 2000 Mitisubishi Eclipse GT Want It All Motor
ORIGINAL: EMonz57
you will never get out of the 14s with an all motor 3G eclipse. They make hardly any power on bolt ons.. youll ge to about 210WHP and thats about where it will end unless you got a HUGE banck accout and een still my little turbo motor will freaking make it look stupid
you will never get out of the 14s with an all motor 3G eclipse. They make hardly any power on bolt ons.. youll ge to about 210WHP and thats about where it will end unless you got a HUGE banck accout and een still my little turbo motor will freaking make it look stupid
your 2000 fed spec GT all motor
vs
my 2001 just a turbo no motor yet
you'll see the difference.. and you'll want some of this *pu$$y* $h|t tehe
not to flame but i am a big supporter with a turbo in our 3g's
#14
03-24-2007, 04:12 AM
RE: 2000 Mitisubishi Eclipse GT Want It All Motor
ORIGINAL: Wingo171
Actually, non FI in the GT motor of a 2000 is capable of pushing close *not as efficiently as a turbo* to the same power if compared to a small turbo. A lightened flywheel, performance clutch, cat back exhaust, CAI w/Performance intake manifold+TB, Headers, Fuel Injectors, Fuel Pump, Spark plugs+Spark Cables. I have done research and debated both, the main reason I prefer turbo is you can get bettergas mileage on your car if you want to by not using the boost but rather letting the TC condense your air and cool it off for ya while reusing any unburned fuel that is emitted as exhaust, and you can use a TC with Stock internals and push it's limits or Build the internals and crank up the PSI to exceed and pretty well double the stock Horse.
Actually, non FI in the GT motor of a 2000 is capable of pushing close *not as efficiently as a turbo* to the same power if compared to a small turbo. A lightened flywheel, performance clutch, cat back exhaust, CAI w/Performance intake manifold+TB, Headers, Fuel Injectors, Fuel Pump, Spark plugs+Spark Cables. I have done research and debated both, the main reason I prefer turbo is you can get bettergas mileage on your car if you want to by not using the boost but rather letting the TC condense your air and cool it off for ya while reusing any unburned fuel that is emitted as exhaust, and you can use a TC with Stock internals and push it's limits or Build the internals and crank up the PSI to exceed and pretty well double the stock Horse.
you spend all that money on A lightened flywheel, performance clutch, cat back exhaust, CAI w/Performance intake manifold+TB, Headers, Fuel Injectors, Fuel Pump, Spark plugs+Spark Cables
you'll only get what max 275whp? with all that done.. i mean not bad.. but hey im running that on 7psi and 300whp at 8psi.. upgrade my pistons and your all motor wont be able to catch up.
build that motor.. slap on a turbo.. and insted of hondakiller you can be named vettekiller now which one sounds more beefy and bad.. oh man i beat a honda today... oh its so nice..
or dude i beat a vette =D
our cars are heavy... very heavy... and its basicly a tank ranging around 3000pounds well mine is 3227 pounds and with all motor you wont see or taste the 13s because the power in the motor wont get to it fast enough before the 1/4 is up.. get a built motor like i said slap on a turbo and some drag tires... tune it up good.. and your looking at what.. ive seen our 3g's hit mid 11's
#15
03-24-2007, 04:14 AM
RE: 2000 Mitisubishi Eclipse GT Want It All Motor
ORIGINAL: 00ECLIPSEGTNY
I got this new toy its a 2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse GT and i want it to be a sleeper. All Motor I think NOS and Turbo are some ***** ****. so let me know what needs to be done for this baby to be running the strip.
LOCK IT UP.IMMA HONDA KILLER>
I got this new toy its a 2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse GT and i want it to be a sleeper. All Motor I think NOS and Turbo are some ***** ****. so let me know what needs to be done for this baby to be running the strip.
LOCK IT UP.IMMA HONDA KILLER>
sorry you just got me heated up... i didnt pay around 15k on all the mods and work i have done to it and for some kid to come in here and say its ***** Sh*t 4k turbo 5k motor, 6k everything else.. not to mention i bought the car for 12k
dont take it personal.. im just ranting
#16
03-24-2007, 07:41 AM
RE: 2000 Mitisubishi Eclipse GT Want It All Motor
watch this video.. and tell me if you change your mind or not =D
http://www.bebo.com/FlashBox.jsp?Fla...xId=3744594486
http://www.bebo.com/FlashBox.jsp?Fla...xId=3744594486
#18
03-24-2007, 10:22 AM
RE: 2000 Mitisubishi Eclipse GT Want It All Motor
ORIGINAL: WPSpyderGT01
here let me explain.. its KNOWN FACT that our GT pistons.. are a piece of crap... even pepboys pistons will work better for crying out loud... and dont get me started on the GTS pistons.. POS
you spend all that money on A lightened flywheel, performance clutch, cat back exhaust, CAI w/Performance intake manifold+TB, Headers, Fuel Injectors, Fuel Pump, Spark plugs+Spark Cables
you'll only get what max 275whp? with all that done.. i mean not bad.. but hey im running that on 7psi and 300whp at 8psi.. upgrade my pistons and your all motor wont be able to catch up.
build that motor.. slap on a turbo.. and insted of hondakiller you can be named vettekiller now which one sounds more beefy and bad.. oh man i beat a honda today... oh its so nice..
or dude i beat a vette =D
our cars are heavy... very heavy... and its basicly a tank ranging around 3000pounds well mine is 3227 pounds and with all motor you wont see or taste the 13s because the power in the motor wont get to it fast enough before the 1/4 is up.. get a built motor like i said slap on a turbo and some drag tires... tune it up good.. and your looking at what.. ive seen our 3g's hit mid 11's
ORIGINAL: Wingo171
Actually, non FI in the GT motor of a 2000 is capable of pushing close *not as efficiently as a turbo* to the same power if compared to a small turbo. A lightened flywheel, performance clutch, cat back exhaust, CAI w/Performance intake manifold+TB, Headers, Fuel Injectors, Fuel Pump, Spark plugs+Spark Cables. I have done research and debated both, the main reason I prefer turbo is you can get bettergas mileage on your car if you want to by not using the boost but rather letting the TC condense your air and cool it off for ya while reusing any unburned fuel that is emitted as exhaust, and you can use a TC with Stock internals and push it's limits or Build the internals and crank up the PSI to exceed and pretty well double the stock Horse.
Actually, non FI in the GT motor of a 2000 is capable of pushing close *not as efficiently as a turbo* to the same power if compared to a small turbo. A lightened flywheel, performance clutch, cat back exhaust, CAI w/Performance intake manifold+TB, Headers, Fuel Injectors, Fuel Pump, Spark plugs+Spark Cables. I have done research and debated both, the main reason I prefer turbo is you can get bettergas mileage on your car if you want to by not using the boost but rather letting the TC condense your air and cool it off for ya while reusing any unburned fuel that is emitted as exhaust, and you can use a TC with Stock internals and push it's limits or Build the internals and crank up the PSI to exceed and pretty well double the stock Horse.
you spend all that money on A lightened flywheel, performance clutch, cat back exhaust, CAI w/Performance intake manifold+TB, Headers, Fuel Injectors, Fuel Pump, Spark plugs+Spark Cables
you'll only get what max 275whp? with all that done.. i mean not bad.. but hey im running that on 7psi and 300whp at 8psi.. upgrade my pistons and your all motor wont be able to catch up.
build that motor.. slap on a turbo.. and insted of hondakiller you can be named vettekiller now which one sounds more beefy and bad.. oh man i beat a honda today... oh its so nice..
or dude i beat a vette =D
our cars are heavy... very heavy... and its basicly a tank ranging around 3000pounds well mine is 3227 pounds and with all motor you wont see or taste the 13s because the power in the motor wont get to it fast enough before the 1/4 is up.. get a built motor like i said slap on a turbo and some drag tires... tune it up good.. and your looking at what.. ive seen our 3g's hit mid 11's
#19
03-25-2007, 02:07 PM
RE: 2000 Mitisubishi Eclipse GT Want It All Motor
I fully understand that our pistons are crap and blah blah blah, but I'm saying going NA is still possible to get some good power out of our motors. I'm not saying great power, but at least you can kill hondas, and for me that makes me happier than killing vettes because vettes are good cars and people can go ahead and praise vettes ,they're actually sporty cars, but hondas p!$$ me off because I live in ohio, about 30 minutes from a Honda plant, and all the little kids aroud here have a Honda and think they're something special and they praise their peices of s#!t. As well as it's safer for the beginner tuners to go NA until they get some experience under their belt, they shouldn't be slappin a turbo in their car cause that's a quick way to blow a motor, especially in our 3G's.
#20
03-25-2007, 03:15 PM
RE: 2000 Mitisubishi Eclipse GT Want It All Motor
ORIGINAL: Wingo171
I fully understand that our pistons are crap and blah blah blah, but I'm saying going NA is still possible to get some good power out of our motors. I'm not saying great power, but at least you can kill hondas, and for me that makes me happier than killing vettes because vettes are good cars and people can go ahead and praise vettes ,they're actually sporty cars, but hondas p!$$ me off because I live in ohio, about 30 minutes from a Honda plant, and all the little kids aroud here have a Honda and think they're something special and they praise their peices of s#!t. As well as it's safer for the beginner tuners to go NA until they get some experience under their belt, they shouldn't be slappin a turbo in their car cause that's a quick way to blow a motor, especially in our 3G's.
I fully understand that our pistons are crap and blah blah blah, but I'm saying going NA is still possible to get some good power out of our motors. I'm not saying great power, but at least you can kill hondas, and for me that makes me happier than killing vettes because vettes are good cars and people can go ahead and praise vettes ,they're actually sporty cars, but hondas p!$$ me off because I live in ohio, about 30 minutes from a Honda plant, and all the little kids aroud here have a Honda and think they're something special and they praise their peices of s#!t. As well as it's safer for the beginner tuners to go NA until they get some experience under their belt, they shouldn't be slappin a turbo in their car cause that's a quick way to blow a motor, especially in our 3G's.