![]() |
RE: convirtable
First i have ever heard of it.
Well, they are ugly as **** lol. |
RE: convirtable
The targa almost looks like an old school 240 or 300. I like the convertable better although I'll never own another convertable again after having my '97 Spyder.
|
RE: convirtable
ORIGINAL: Sebba First i have ever heard of it. Well, they are ugly as **** lol. |
RE: convirtable
wow i just saw that DSM tribute that 1990 posted, that convirty does look pretty good
|
RE: convirtable
ORIGINAL: EMonz57 ORIGINAL: Sebba First i have ever heard of it. Well, they are ugly as **** lol. |
RE: convirtable
No I know for a fact they are based on the same platform. I was talking in reply to sebba. The crossfire and SLK 320 share the exact same motor and appearences out side of the car.
|
RE: convirtable
Aight : ) I wasnt calling bull****. I was simply saying i know nothing on the subject.
I have never liked either cars, so it comes as no supprise. |
RE: convirtable
ORIGINAL: Sebba Aight : ) I wasnt calling bull****. I was simply saying i know nothing on the subject. I have never liked either cars, so it comes as no supprise. |
RE: convirtable
Everyone i asked that has driven an ordinary crossfire and the SLK for that matter, said they hated it. Come to think of it, top gear said they hated it too.
Back in 2000 my dad had a SLk for a few weeks... and absolutly dispised it. |
RE: convirtable
the non supercharged version are alot more lame. the ineriors suck all around. but they handle ok and the car was still fun to drive they feel faster than they are because of the size of the car. But the SRT version screws that is for sure. The shifters feel cheezy like its a toy and you can break it or something and the dash and instruments are not appealing visually
|
| All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:29 AM. |
© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands