View Poll Results: A poll
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll
December Voting!!!
Agreed. But since i had planned to put more than that into the car to get it to that standard... it really dosent bother me. Its more practical and its cheaper technically. So why not?
ORIGINAL: Sebba
Agreed. But since i had planned to put more than that into the car to get it to that standard... it really dosent bother me. Its more practical and its cheaper technically. So why not?
Agreed. But since i had planned to put more than that into the car to get it to that standard... it really dosent bother me. Its more practical and its cheaper technically. So why not?
the 98s were hardly more rare and the 99 still looks way better
ORIGINAL: Sebba
Agreed but you have to understand that they are alot more.. and that limits me to what i can spend on the car. Why is it better to start off stock?
Agreed but you have to understand that they are alot more.. and that limits me to what i can spend on the car. Why is it better to start off stock?
ORIGINAL: 94 3kgt sl
but didnt the 99' and 98 not have active aero and other things like that. get a 1 gen or 2 gen. they have active aero. imo thats the coolest thing i have ever seen in a car. also the active exhaust.
but didnt the 99' and 98 not have active aero and other things like that. get a 1 gen or 2 gen. they have active aero. imo thats the coolest thing i have ever seen in a car. also the active exhaust.
the 99 specs are the only good 3000GTs. That is the only one i would ever buy.











