GSX vs. TransAM
#31
01-31-2007 | 05:31 PM
Super Moderator
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,758
From:
RE: GSX vs. TransAM
then really you havnt been looking. Ive seen vids of evo 9's that have run high 12's with ZERO mods. The best i believe was a 12.7. And then with only about 1k-1.5k in mods they are in the 12's. So once again you dont know what your talking about. Just go back to your mustang forums with your other buddies that come in here. And also Emonz has an evo 8 that he has only put about 1k in mods and it will run a mid to low 12 sec.
#32
01-31-2007 | 05:43 PM
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 728
From:
RE: GSX vs. TransAM
ORIGINAL: Riceisbad
Nice sig you ****ing ******.
Where did you pull that **** from, an ****ing Jap anime cartoon?? Thats just plain retarded.
ORIGINAL: Lil Evo
^^^Somebody ban this bitch, he's just here to make problems, same as that SRT pric that came around a few months ago. Dude, if you've got nothing constructive, or anything that will some how help someone in some way, shape or form, get the hell out. Nobody likes trouble making asshats.
^^^Somebody ban this bitch, he's just here to make problems, same as that SRT pric that came around a few months ago. Dude, if you've got nothing constructive, or anything that will some how help someone in some way, shape or form, get the hell out. Nobody likes trouble making asshats.
Where did you pull that **** from, an ****ing Jap anime cartoon?? Thats just plain retarded.
#33
01-31-2007 | 06:12 PM
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 12,084
RE: GSX vs. TransAM
ORIGINAL: Riceisbad
They don't run 12.7's or 12.9's you ****ing retard. Maybe you've never been to a real track (and no the Quick Check parking lot doesn't count riceboy) but no Evo I've ever seen has even broken into the 12's without at least $2K in mods. And then they run high 12's at like 104MPH. Pathetic, its a waste of a car, I simply laugh at the retards who bring those things to the track and then either stall them out, fry the clutch, or just plain break them because they are garbage.
ORIGINAL: EMonz57
to bad *** pirate the IXs run 12.7s in RS trim and regualr run 12.9s.... what a freakin american ricer who knows nothing about the cars he talks about. even his own american cars.............. clown
ORIGINAL: Muscle rules
No stock Evo 8 has ever broken 12's. They only have 235WHP, its near impossible. Not to mention they only trap at 101MPH, which is pathetic. If I ran a low 13 at 101MPH I'd go home and sell my car, because that is downright pathetic.
And no, idiot, Evos are not faster than LS1's. Last time I checked, 108MPH was a hell of a lot faster than 101MPH in a 1/4 mile. Your math skills must be just as bad as your taste in cars.
ORIGINAL: Sebba
BUAHAHAHAHAHAHA do you not realise that an 03 EVO 8 is actually faster? Factory predictions are not accurate. Stock 8s have been known to get into the 12s without mods.
BUAHAHAHAHAHAHA do you not realise that an 03 EVO 8 is actually faster? Factory predictions are not accurate. Stock 8s have been known to get into the 12s without mods.
And no, idiot, Evos are not faster than LS1's. Last time I checked, 108MPH was a hell of a lot faster than 101MPH in a 1/4 mile. Your math skills must be just as bad as your taste in cars.
Actually you need me to do the research for you jack ***. I Have not even $1000 into my car and I am only a few bolt ons away from 11s. yes under$1000 to get mid 12s on my car that stock ran a 13.9. the 2006 IX are hitting 12.7s in RS trim and 12.9s in base trim. again your jsut a narrow minded fool who cant take the fact that displacment means nothing these days other than make a badass exhaust not
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DjCorkscrew
Private 'Wanted' Classifieds
0
03-20-2006 11:18 PM
