2nd Generation This includes all Eclipses, and Talons built from 1995-1999

gs vs gs-t???

Old Dec 4, 2005 | 10:58 PM
  #11  
slow420a's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,337
Default RE: gs vs gs-t???


ORIGINAL: eclipsed4u

a GS running 8psi(safe on the 420a) will hit about 250whp.
Neve will happen...210 at the crank.
 
Old Dec 5, 2005 | 12:42 AM
  #12  
Blue03Evo's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 99
From:
Default RE: gs vs gs-t???

i really wouldn't worry about the crank walk. If you are than just get a 1st gen GSX and you will be set.
 
Old Dec 5, 2005 | 10:07 AM
  #13  
get435's Avatar
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,214
From:
Default RE: gs vs gs-t???

but it has to be a 6bolt not a 7bolt 1G.
 
Old Dec 5, 2005 | 10:56 AM
  #14  
eclipsed4u's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 862
Default RE: gs vs gs-t???


ORIGINAL: slow420a


ORIGINAL: eclipsed4u

a GS running 8psi(safe on the 420a) will hit about 250whp.
Neve will happen...210 at the crank.
http://www.hahnracecraft.com/auto/ec...ipsestage2.htm

at 9psi....250-275bhp......so i was a little off, but you are way too low.
 
Old Dec 5, 2005 | 08:18 PM
  #15  
dreamz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 92
Default RE: gs vs gs-t???

I would go with the first gen but I really like the look of the second gen looks alot better and i dont like the front dash of the 1 gen looks like a cliff fell over
 
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 07:55 PM
  #16  
TheAdvocate's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,323
From: Baraboo, WI
Default RE: gs vs gs-t???

True, I have seen a few GS's with over 300 hp though.. Granted they had more into the motor, and ya I don't believe much of it was stock...
 
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 08:18 PM
  #17  
slow420a's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,337
Default RE: gs vs gs-t???

http://forums.2g nt.com/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=4&topic_id=68886&m ode=full

Hahn lies, kid was running 10 psi on a stage 2 kit, built motor, cams, 52mm throttle body and a bunch of other things and only hit 222whp... your right i was a bit low but for the hp at the crank its not going to hit 250 on a stock motor with only a stage 2 kit at 8-9 psi.
 
Old Dec 7, 2005 | 10:36 AM
  #18  
eclipsed4u's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 862
Default RE: gs vs gs-t???


ORIGINAL: slow420a

http://forums.2g nt.com/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=4&topic_id=68886&m ode=full

Hahn lies, kid was running 10 psi on a stage 2 kit, built motor, cams, 52mm throttle body and a bunch of other things and only hit 222whp... your right i was a bit low but for the hp at the crank its not going to hit 250 on a stock motor with only a stage 2 kit at 8-9 psi.
boy, the 420a really does suck. but how good was his tune?
 
Old Dec 7, 2005 | 11:07 AM
  #19  
anko_kun's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 634
From: Beaumont ,TX
Default RE: gs vs gs-t???

go with a gs-t you start with a faster car and if you dont have the money right a way you still have a turboed car to drive around and hae fun that is what i am doing
 
Old Dec 7, 2005 | 11:39 AM
  #20  
slow420a's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,337
Default RE: gs vs gs-t???


ORIGINAL: eclipsed4u


ORIGINAL: slow420a

http://forums.2g nt.com/dcboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=4&topic_id=68886&m ode=full

Hahn lies, kid was running 10 psi on a stage 2 kit, built motor, cams, 52mm throttle body and a bunch of other things and only hit 222whp... your right i was a bit low but for the hp at the crank its not going to hit 250 on a stock motor with only a stage 2 kit at 8-9 psi.
boy, the 420a really does suck. but how good was his tune?
lol good as it can be with what hahn give you. What they fail to mention is that with the 420a(the purpule one on the site) which only has the stage 2 kit and their cat back is that its got a few extras that hahn dosent offer. Hahn has an awsome setup for over 10 psi applications its called the port fuler system(8 injector setup) its an awesome tune but cant control timming and spark so after 15psi or so it takes a bit more to get it going. Back on topic that car has a sfmu which is 10 times better then the cartech fmu that they supply with their kits also they use some sort of stand alone unit or ecu to get those dyno numbers. Ya its a dirty trick but its what they do and most of the time people who boost their cars dont dyno tune if theyare only going to run 8psi.
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:12 PM.