2nd Generation This includes all Eclipses, and Talons built from 1995-1999

power goals

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 10:52 PM
  #1  
dorian7's Avatar
Thread Starter
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 740
From:
Default power goals

Ok so here is a list of mods that I either have or are going to get eventually I was looking at making about 350hp tell me if you guys think this would do it:

stroker kit w/ eagle rods
balance shaft removal
Evo III @ 18psi
550 cc injectors
190lph fuel pump
SAFC NEO
wideband o2
Act 2600 w/ streetlight flywheel
K and N filtercharger + intake
1g bov
hard ic piping
magnaflow cat back

 
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 11:07 PM
  #2  
Sebba's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 16,176
From: Austin, TX
Default RE: power goals

stroker kit w/ eagle rods (This is big overkill, but still nice to have)
balance shaft removal (yup thats good)
Evo III @ 18psi (try more like 23)
550 cc injectors (I would go for 660cc)
190lph fuel pump (Yup thats good)
SAFC NEO (I would get DSM Link)
wideband o2
Act 2600 w/ streetlight flywheel
K and N filtercharger + intake
1g bov (Something a little better, maybe a forge)
hard ic piping (You will need a FMIC)
magnaflow cat back
 
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 11:21 PM
  #3  
sk8dudety's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,891
From:
Default RE: power goals

also with the act clutch get the street disc...
 
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 11:22 PM
  #4  
nemzy's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 19
Default RE: power goals

sorry dumb question but i rather ask then just wonder wtf is a "dsm link" i got everything but that part.and i dont see how a lighter flywheels going to help if your dragging but hey theres trail and error.
 
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 11:24 PM
  #5  
Sebba's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 16,176
From: Austin, TX
Default RE: power goals

It helps in general. Less rotational mass = generally good.

DSMLink = Tuning device
 
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 11:36 PM
  #6  
sk8dudety's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,891
From:
Default RE: power goals

yea a lightweight flywheel makes a pretty big difference... there's a solid 15lb. difference between my old stock flywheel and my new fidanza lightweight flywheel... that dramatically reduces rotational mass and will rev your engine up much quicker
 
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 11:49 PM
  #7  
nemzy's Avatar
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 19
Default RE: power goals

maybe i didnt explain my self why.here the plus for lighter fly less rotational mass means you will reach higher engine speed faster but will loose it or be harder to retain by the next shift. lighter fly are more commonly used in circut racing where you want to speed up as quick as possible and slow down before you enter a corner. doesnt always mean you are going to havethegreatestgain in every occasion. when you look at drags they dont lighten there flys cause they want the momentem and they want to retain it by time you shift you may have lost some with a lighter fly. but it wouldnt do much good either way without lightening the internals it may just be a step towardsthat
 
Old Feb 21, 2008 | 07:15 AM
  #8  
TheEngineer's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,758
From:
Default RE: power goals

I agree with sebba on everything except the fuel pump. I think your gonna want a 255 for that type of boost
 
Old Feb 21, 2008 | 03:29 PM
  #9  
Sebba's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 16,176
From: Austin, TX
Default RE: power goals

Well the 190lph has done it just fine before.
 
Old Feb 21, 2008 | 06:42 PM
  #10  
TheAdvocate's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,323
From: Baraboo, WI
Default RE: power goals

Ya, I ran my 20g at 18 lbs with a 190 and had no problems with it..

The stroker kit will help your spool time, but you would be better off saving that money, b/c you wont need it with just a 16g turbo.. Unless your planning on getting into autox..
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:55 PM.