2nd Generation This includes all Eclipses, and Talons built from 1995-1999

screw eclipses!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Old Nov 28, 2005 | 06:07 PM
  #41  
EMonz57's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 12,084
Default RE: screw eclipses!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


ORIGINAL: eclipsed4u

ORIGINAL: bigwilly8941

dude my eclipse run mid to high 14's and im bone stock yeah u def need to learn to drive it better there guy cuz honda aint gonna do nothing for ya but cost u money...
do you want a cookie?

so you have a gs-t, and this guy has a heavy *** spyder GS....and you are trying to compare the two? do you know anything about the eclipse?
I was thinking the same thing a heavy GS with what 140HP and a normal weight GS-t at 210HP hmmm high 14s should be in its sight. If its a GS-t running high 14s then hey he is a good driver because I have only seen alot of low 15s outta GSts
 
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 12:04 AM
  #42  
slow420a's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,337
Default RE: screw eclipses!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


ORIGINAL: EMonz57
I was thinking the same thing a heavy GS with what 140HP and a normal weight GS-t at 210HP hmmm high 14s should be in its sight. If its a GS-t running high 14s then hey he is a good driver because I have only seen alot of low 15s outta GSts
Na he is right everyone knows that you take your best track time and subtract 4 tenths... jesus does anyone follow the rules of 2f&2f!
 
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 02:42 PM
  #43  
shreff99's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,213
From: Franklin, PA
Default RE: screw eclipses!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I would definately feel pretty confident about running my '99 GS-T against a Civic any day of the week even for slips.
 
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 03:24 PM
  #44  
EMonz57's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 12,084
Default RE: screw eclipses!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


ORIGINAL: shreff99

I would definately feel pretty confident about running my '99 GS-T against a Civic any day of the week even for slips.
Well stock for stock an Si is faster so if your stock dont do it lol
 
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 03:42 PM
  #45  
Blue03Evo's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 99
From:
Default RE: screw eclipses!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


ORIGINAL: EMonz57


ORIGINAL: 97GSpower

exactly so overall a honda is better for racing lol and by the way, racing me with your ****ing EVO? What the **** *******? That's a huge *** ****ing difference. Im talking about a built b16 against a built 4g63 with the same mods...know who would win...the HONDA. Even with a b16 boosted with 12 psi and 3" exhaust all the back with stage 1 or 2 cams would hang with that EVO pretty damn easy. It's going to be in a hatch. They weigh like 2000 with the driver in them.

Dude not quite. ok my EVO has a 4G63 the same as the Eclipses. and a B16 to hang with my car will need money out the *** just to hang with it. all I need is a turbo back and SAFC and a fuel pump and ill hit low 12s all day long.. add some cams and an allky kit and ill see mid\high 11s all day long. and that would still be cheaper for me to buy those modes then to boost a honda with a swap. hondas are gay and sound even worse than they perform.

I have raced a few boost civics not sure what #s they were running but lets just say I spanked thm from a roll. where my EVO is the worst and the still were at least 3 cars behind oh and I was stock at that
Hey man i dont mean to bust your ***** but its harder than what you think to get these evo's into the mid 11's. it wasn't easy to get mine there. 12's no problem but it did take a **** load of money to get mine low 11's and not putting my motor in danger.

plus like you said our motors may be the same as a 4G63 eclipse but our internals are much better with a hole lot more head flow.

i completely agree with civic's sucking. i hate them.

 
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 04:26 PM
  #46  
EMonz57's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 12,084
Default RE: screw eclipses!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


ORIGINAL: Blue03Evo


ORIGINAL: EMonz57


ORIGINAL: 97GSpower

exactly so overall a honda is better for racing lol and by the way, racing me with your ****ing EVO? What the **** *******? That's a huge *** ****ing difference. Im talking about a built b16 against a built 4g63 with the same mods...know who would win...the HONDA. Even with a b16 boosted with 12 psi and 3" exhaust all the back with stage 1 or 2 cams would hang with that EVO pretty damn easy. It's going to be in a hatch. They weigh like 2000 with the driver in them.

Dude not quite. ok my EVO has a 4G63 the same as the Eclipses. and a B16 to hang with my car will need money out the *** just to hang with it. all I need is a turbo back and SAFC and a fuel pump and ill hit low 12s all day long.. add some cams and an allky kit and ill see mid\high 11s all day long. and that would still be cheaper for me to buy those modes then to boost a honda with a swap. hondas are gay and sound even worse than they perform.

I have raced a few boost civics not sure what #s they were running but lets just say I spanked thm from a roll. where my EVO is the worst and the still were at least 3 cars behind oh and I was stock at that
Hey man i dont mean to bust your ***** but its harder than what you think to get these evo's into the mid 11's. it wasn't easy to get mine there. 12's no problem but it did take a **** load of money to get mine low 11's and not putting my motor in danger.

plus like you said our motors may be the same as a 4G63 eclipse but our internals are much better with a hole lot more head flow.

i completely agree with civic's sucking. i hate them.

I know the internals are better along with Tranny, but its the ame engine gode that was my point. and getting into the 11s on the stock turbo is posable many have done it and that isnt bad I dont know many cars that can do that, the supras sure cant and RX7s can barley
 
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 04:47 PM
  #47  
Blue03Evo's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 99
From:
Default RE: screw eclipses!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


ORIGINAL: EMonz57


ORIGINAL: Blue03Evo


ORIGINAL: EMonz57


ORIGINAL: 97GSpower

exactly so overall a honda is better for racing lol and by the way, racing me with your ****ing EVO? What the **** *******? That's a huge *** ****ing difference. Im talking about a built b16 against a built 4g63 with the same mods...know who would win...the HONDA. Even with a b16 boosted with 12 psi and 3" exhaust all the back with stage 1 or 2 cams would hang with that EVO pretty damn easy. It's going to be in a hatch. They weigh like 2000 with the driver in them.

Dude not quite. ok my EVO has a 4G63 the same as the Eclipses. and a B16 to hang with my car will need money out the *** just to hang with it. all I need is a turbo back and SAFC and a fuel pump and ill hit low 12s all day long.. add some cams and an allky kit and ill see mid\high 11s all day long. and that would still be cheaper for me to buy those modes then to boost a honda with a swap. hondas are gay and sound even worse than they perform.

I have raced a few boost civics not sure what #s they were running but lets just say I spanked thm from a roll. where my EVO is the worst and the still were at least 3 cars behind oh and I was stock at that
Hey man i dont mean to bust your ***** but its harder than what you think to get these evo's into the mid 11's. it wasn't easy to get mine there. 12's no problem but it did take a **** load of money to get mine low 11's and not putting my motor in danger.

plus like you said our motors may be the same as a 4G63 eclipse but our internals are much better with a hole lot more head flow.

i completely agree with civic's sucking. i hate them.

I know the internals are better along with Tranny, but its the ame engine gode that was my point. and getting into the 11s on the stock turbo is posable many have done it and that isnt bad I dont know many cars that can do that, the supras sure cant and RX7s can barley
yeah i know what you meant i was just throwing some info out there.

I was just saying its not cheap and yes on the stock turbo. just be very very careful with the boost on yours. before i upgraded the turbo on mine i was pushing 25psi through the 16g and i fried the turbo within month. my buddy had the same exact problem.
 
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 05:18 PM
  #48  
EMonz57's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 12,084
Default RE: screw eclipses!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


ORIGINAL: Blue03Evo


ORIGINAL: EMonz57


ORIGINAL: Blue03Evo


ORIGINAL: EMonz57


ORIGINAL: 97GSpower

exactly so overall a honda is better for racing lol and by the way, racing me with your ****ing EVO? What the **** *******? That's a huge *** ****ing difference. Im talking about a built b16 against a built 4g63 with the same mods...know who would win...the HONDA. Even with a b16 boosted with 12 psi and 3" exhaust all the back with stage 1 or 2 cams would hang with that EVO pretty damn easy. It's going to be in a hatch. They weigh like 2000 with the driver in them.

Dude not quite. ok my EVO has a 4G63 the same as the Eclipses. and a B16 to hang with my car will need money out the *** just to hang with it. all I need is a turbo back and SAFC and a fuel pump and ill hit low 12s all day long.. add some cams and an allky kit and ill see mid\high 11s all day long. and that would still be cheaper for me to buy those modes then to boost a honda with a swap. hondas are gay and sound even worse than they perform.

I have raced a few boost civics not sure what #s they were running but lets just say I spanked thm from a roll. where my EVO is the worst and the still were at least 3 cars behind oh and I was stock at that
Hey man i dont mean to bust your ***** but its harder than what you think to get these evo's into the mid 11's. it wasn't easy to get mine there. 12's no problem but it did take a **** load of money to get mine low 11's and not putting my motor in danger.

plus like you said our motors may be the same as a 4G63 eclipse but our internals are much better with a hole lot more head flow.

i completely agree with civic's sucking. i hate them.

I know the internals are better along with Tranny, but its the ame engine gode that was my point. and getting into the 11s on the stock turbo is posable many have done it and that isnt bad I dont know many cars that can do that, the supras sure cant and RX7s can barley
yeah i know what you meant i was just throwing some info out there.

I was just saying its not cheap and yes on the stock turbo. just be very very careful with the boost on yours. before i upgraded the turbo on mine i was pushing 25psi through the 16g and i fried the turbo within month. my buddy had the same exact problem.

Well the 16G is really most effiecient at 22-23PSI I have seen a few tools running 28 with alky. im not going to run more than 22 any way. The reason was I was saying that was the civic wont get to the 11s anywhere near as easy as an EVO
 
Old Nov 29, 2005 | 11:32 PM
  #49  
Blue03Evo's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 99
From:
Default RE: screw eclipses!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

yeah i completely agree with you. it does take a lot more cash to get a civic in the 11's.
 
Old Nov 30, 2005 | 09:51 AM
  #50  
get435's Avatar
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,214
From:
Default RE: screw eclipses!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

so i got a question can i slap a evo head on my car? gst
 

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:56 AM.