why not supercharge it?
I dunno I would think that even if the Eclipse were taking business away from the Evo what's it really matter they're both Mitsu and maybe some of us poor saps would rather have the Eclipse body instead of the lancer? I dunno just my thoughts on the whole idea.
ORIGINAL: Sanguinius
I dunno I would think that even if the Eclipse were taking business away from the Evo what's it really matter they're both Mitsu and maybe some of us poor saps would rather have the Eclipse body instead of the lancer? I dunno just my thoughts on the whole idea.
I dunno I would think that even if the Eclipse were taking business away from the Evo what's it really matter they're both Mitsu and maybe some of us poor saps would rather have the Eclipse body instead of the lancer? I dunno just my thoughts on the whole idea.
1. Mitsu has the eclipse for people who like to "cruise", and the evo for people who want performance. If both cars offer performance, then the people who want that will choose one or the other, while people who just want a cruising car will look elsewhere.
2. If the eclipse was supercharged, it would be very expensive and not too many could afford it. The top of the line eclipse is already around $28k, almost as much as an evo, and if it were supercharged, not only would it cost more, but all it could do was drag race because the frame was not designed to handle well around a track like the evo.
ORIGINAL: DSMTalonAWD51
You have to consider two things though.
1. Mitsu has the eclipse for people who like to "cruise", and the evo for people who want performance. If both cars offer performance, then the people who want that will choose one or the other, while people who just want a cruising car will look elsewhere.
2. If the eclipse was supercharged, it would be very expensive and not too many could afford it. The top of the line eclipse is already around $28k, almost as much as an evo, and if it were supercharged, not only would it cost more, but all it could do was drag race because the frame was not designed to handle well around a track like the evo.
ORIGINAL: Sanguinius
I dunno I would think that even if the Eclipse were taking business away from the Evo what's it really matter they're both Mitsu and maybe some of us poor saps would rather have the Eclipse body instead of the lancer? I dunno just my thoughts on the whole idea.
I dunno I would think that even if the Eclipse were taking business away from the Evo what's it really matter they're both Mitsu and maybe some of us poor saps would rather have the Eclipse body instead of the lancer? I dunno just my thoughts on the whole idea.
1. Mitsu has the eclipse for people who like to "cruise", and the evo for people who want performance. If both cars offer performance, then the people who want that will choose one or the other, while people who just want a cruising car will look elsewhere.
2. If the eclipse was supercharged, it would be very expensive and not too many could afford it. The top of the line eclipse is already around $28k, almost as much as an evo, and if it were supercharged, not only would it cost more, but all it could do was drag race because the frame was not designed to handle well around a track like the evo.
well i dont know much about superchargers but i do know that most of the people around me with turbo kits on their car do better in the street races then those with superchargers. with a bigger engine the twin turbos seem to work great and with 4 bangers plain old turbo kits give a nice boost to be honest id rather see the 6 cylinder with twin turbos then with the supercharger but maby thats just me
ORIGINAL: eclipse93gs
well i dont know much about superchargers
Apparently you dont know much about turbos either.
ORIGINAL: eclipse93gs
but i do know that most of the people around me with turbo kits on their car do better in the street races then those with superchargers.
boosted civic vs kb cobra?
ORIGINAL: eclipse93gs
with a bigger engine the twin turbos seem to work great and with 4 bangers...
WTF were your trying to say here? Twin turbo 4 cyl, possible but not feseable. Meaning its more work to make it happen and the results are the same with a big turbo.
ORIGINAL: eclipse93gs
honest id rather see the 6 cylinder with twin turbos then with the supercharger but maby thats just me
If you dont feel this way raise your right hand....
well i dont know much about superchargers
Apparently you dont know much about turbos either.
ORIGINAL: eclipse93gs
but i do know that most of the people around me with turbo kits on their car do better in the street races then those with superchargers.
boosted civic vs kb cobra?
ORIGINAL: eclipse93gs
with a bigger engine the twin turbos seem to work great and with 4 bangers...
WTF were your trying to say here? Twin turbo 4 cyl, possible but not feseable. Meaning its more work to make it happen and the results are the same with a big turbo.
ORIGINAL: eclipse93gs
honest id rather see the 6 cylinder with twin turbos then with the supercharger but maby thats just me
If you dont feel this way raise your right hand....
ORIGINAL: Sanguinius
I wonder if 93GS is related to Nontoxic who has since disappeared...
I wonder if 93GS is related to Nontoxic who has since disappeared...


