3.5 LITER 3KGT?????
#1
3.5 LITER 3KGT?????
I haven't heard of these before but when i was looking for a new engine I saw that you can put a 94-96 Montero 3.5 DOHC non turbo engine in a 3kgt its that true?? good or bad idea?? I don't know just wanting to know
http://www.enginesus.com/ejsp/items....hi&engineid=37
http://www.enginesus.com/ejsp/items....hi&engineid=37
#3
RE: 3.5 LITER 3KGT?????
ORIGINAL: davidmitsusrock
yeah you can but its a dumb idea the 6g72 is an amazing engine why replace it?
yeah you can but its a dumb idea the 6g72 is an amazing engine why replace it?
#4
RE: 3.5 LITER 3KGT?????
dude there is a hell of alot more aftermarket support for the 6g72tt, im just saying 300hp...why the hell would anyone want to swap a 6g72tt for a 3.5 NA v6? for a heavier motor that is harder to find parts for?
#6
RE: 3.5 LITER 3KGT?????
ORIGINAL: davidmitsusrock
dude there is a hell of alot more aftermarket support for the 6g72tt, im just saying 300hp...why the hell would anyone want to swap a 6g72tt for a 3.5 NA v6? for a heavier motor that is harder to find parts for?
dude there is a hell of alot more aftermarket support for the 6g72tt, im just saying 300hp...why the hell would anyone want to swap a 6g72tt for a 3.5 NA v6? for a heavier motor that is harder to find parts for?
#7
RE: 3.5 LITER 3KGT?????
please dont insult my intelligence i reallise it is a good idea for NA but do you understand that you will always be able to make more power with boost then NA. all i am saying is you can get more power through a boosted 6g72tt(or single turbo upgrade mind you) then an NA 6g74 that is all i am saying i just dont think it would be worth it to go from boost to NA(not to many people do that) i reallise it is just trying to be different and that is cool but do not insult me, im trying to make this a simple discussen becouse argueing on the enternet is a stupid waste of time.
#8
RE: 3.5 LITER 3KGT?????
It would work for me since my car is na and I don't the money for a TT conversion and the 2 engines the 3.0 and 3.5 cost the around the same I have seen the 3.5 cheaper then the 3.0 and it has more power so it seems like a good option yeah the engine its heavier don't know how much but has more power so it won't be such a problem
#9
RE: 3.5 LITER 3KGT?????
ORIGINAL: davidmitsusrock
please dont insult my intelligence i reallise it is a good idea for NA but do you understand that you will always be able to make more power with boost then NA. all i am saying is you can get more power through a boosted 6g72tt(or single turbo upgrade mind you) then an NA 6g74 that is all i am saying i just dont think it would be worth it to go from boost to NA(not to many people do that) i reallise it is just trying to be different and that is cool but do not insult me, im trying to make this a simple discussen becouse argueing on the enternet is a stupid waste of time.
please dont insult my intelligence i reallise it is a good idea for NA but do you understand that you will always be able to make more power with boost then NA. all i am saying is you can get more power through a boosted 6g72tt(or single turbo upgrade mind you) then an NA 6g74 that is all i am saying i just dont think it would be worth it to go from boost to NA(not to many people do that) i reallise it is just trying to be different and that is cool but do not insult me, im trying to make this a simple discussen becouse argueing on the enternet is a stupid waste of time.
#10
RE: 3.5 LITER 3KGT?????
well i called it a dumb idea becouse sorry i didnt specify but i thought you were saying its a better option to replace the 6g72tt with a the 3.5l one i was just thinking with that money you could build up the 6g72tt. i guess i didnt fully reallise you were talking about the NA 6g72 so i appologise for not paying enough attention