it gets me really mad when people say that the 3000gt is slow. the n/a anyways. my 1993 is definitly faster then most other cars when i compare them. all these sites that say it runs a 8.5 0-60 cant be accurate. on the same site they have the stealth es listed at 7.1

 

8.5 sounds about right for an ATX.
The ES was probably a MTX, and the ES is probably the lightest of the NA's.

 

More like 5.7 seconds. Check it out. http://www.mpt.org/motorweek/reviews/mit3000gtvr4.html

 

Sure, for a TT version. I've read times anywhere between 5.2 and 5.9 over the years.

 

The N/A would def have a better 0 - 60 if it were RWD. Solid mounts and an LSD could help get your time down though.

 

i find that it's not really the launch that makes the car slow but the lack of power as you approach 6000rpm. a test pipe could help that a little, but its not smog leagal.

 

well i tested the 8.5sec theory with a friend and my ipod and i got a 7.3 0-60. now i know that's not the most accurate way to do it but i wudn't be 1.2sec off! and that was with my automatic 3000gt.

 

very nice guy. buy a g-tech and try it again. maybe it will work better and it will give u whp readings too