3000GT vs. Evolution
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 42
From:
RE: 3000GT vs. Evolution
I would definitely go with a VR-4 it is nowhere near as expensive as the evo. I got my 95 for 3600.00 and the only things wrong were the turbos and that it had been sitting for three years in my uncle’s garage. It still ran when I bought it but I took the induction system off. For the car to be in great condition my investment will only be about 8700.00. P.S. never buy from eBay that is why my favorite car sits once more.
Banned
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 16,176
From: Austin, TX
RE: 3000GT vs. Evolution
I think thats a little too general. I have bought cars off ebay and so have members of my family, all without a problem. I think better advice would be "be careful if your dealing with ebay" agree?
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2
RE: 3000GT vs. Evolution
ORIGINAL: thestealth
Just a side note...everyone's opinions are different...don't let this turn into a flame thread because of that.
They are two totally different cars designed for totally different things. The VR4's were designed to be a GT car, and they fit that role perfectly. They fit two people in comfort, they will hold as much luggage as 2 people need for a weekend trip, they can cover many miles comfortably and quickly.
EVO's well, they're rally cars...and they fit their role perfectly as well.
We are talking about relatively stock vehicles. Any car can be made fast...so that is a moot point.
Just a side note...everyone's opinions are different...don't let this turn into a flame thread because of that.
They are two totally different cars designed for totally different things. The VR4's were designed to be a GT car, and they fit that role perfectly. They fit two people in comfort, they will hold as much luggage as 2 people need for a weekend trip, they can cover many miles comfortably and quickly.
EVO's well, they're rally cars...and they fit their role perfectly as well.
We are talking about relatively stock vehicles. Any car can be made fast...so that is a moot point.
