Mitsubishi Forum - Mitsubishi Enthusiast Forums

Mitsubishi Forum - Mitsubishi Enthusiast Forums (https://mitsubishiforum.com/forum/)
-   Mitsubishi Outlander (https://mitsubishiforum.com/forum/mitsubishi-outlander-10/)
-   -   2009 Mitsubishi Outlander listed in: "Today’s 10 Most Underrated Cars" (MSN Autos) (https://mitsubishiforum.com/forum/mitsubishi-outlander-10/2009-mitsubishi-outlander-listed-today%92s-10-most-underrated-cars-msn-autos-33285/)

tcp Aug 4, 2009 09:04 PM

subarus
 

Originally Posted by Dr. Zoidberg (Post 248133)

In terms of poor traction conditions (i.e. ice and snow) though, full-time awd like what subie offers provides better traction, all things being equal such as tires and throttle input, than real-time awd like in the 2G Outtie.

This only holds true on manual transmission subarus, the automatic has a system that is functionally the same as most other AWD systems.

Dr. Zoidberg Aug 5, 2009 07:13 PM


Originally Posted by tcp (Post 248209)
This only holds true on manual transmission subarus, the automatic has a system that is functionally the same as most other AWD systems.

Good point - one of the reasons why I prefer a std subie.

Some of the subie models and years have different torque distributions. I honestly forget what they are but they are not far off from the manuals, in most cases (I think an auto 04 impreza is 60f:40r and a std impreza is 55f:45r, or was the torque movement 10% between f:r in the auto and 5% in the std?). I think I read somwhere sometime though one of the models starting with a 90f:10r distribution. In any event there is more torque distribution to the rear wheels in most auto transmission subies than most other real-time awd systems.

But the std subies are really the ones that optimize traction in poor conditions.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:14 AM.


© 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands