Mitsubishi Outlander The new crossover from Mitsubishi, mixing the usefulness of an SUV with the size and convenience of a sport wagon.

Fuel Eco. - 60L tank gets you how far?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 12, 2011 | 04:42 PM
  #11  
bigrroberto's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 56
From: Red Deer, Alberta
Default

Originally Posted by nesser
Right now in the winter I get about 400km combined highway/city driving in a Canadian 2009 V6 XLS per tank using REGULAR gas running on my winter tires. I fill up just after the first warning where there is ~10L of fuel left in the tank so calculate using 50L instead of the 60L tank size.

There is more time warming up the car while I'm brushing it off. Can't just jump in and go like in the summer. Also it takes longer for the vehicle to warm up into it's normal operating temperature so it burns more fuel trying to get there faster (higher RPM's when you start cold). Therefore many shorter trips will give you bad mileage since you're running in the warm up mode more often.

The 2010's suggest premium fuel. Not sure if that is just horsepower boost or fuel economy too.
Dude you should bee running premium. The manual doesnt just 'suggest' premium, its required. The reason the 2010 has more hp than the 2009 is because they actually tuned the car differently. With the new tune you require premium fuel or you risk the chance of engine knock.

Premium fuel on its on isnt going to net you hp or fuel economy, the vehicle has to be tuned for it to be effective. For example putting premium in your parents 95 astro van isnt going to make a lick of difference as the engine isnt set-up to utilize the extra octane. However if you were to put regular in a new evo, the thing would knock and go boom.

This is why its important to use the type of fuel the manufacturer requires. The difference in price ($6 on a full tank) isnt going to kill anyone that can afford to purchase this vehicle.

Edit: I get about 400km to a tank all city driving. and when i took it out to the mountains I got about 600km to the tank on purely highway driving. That was also through the mountains and at the time was still technically in the `break-in` period as I only had about 5000km on it. I would think a highway trip through the prairies, at the speed limit, should net around that 600-650km a tank range.
 

Last edited by bigrroberto; Jan 12, 2011 at 04:45 PM.
Old Jan 12, 2011 | 08:48 PM
  #12  
ivanz's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 626
From: Vancouver, Canada
Default

Originally Posted by Colt-Speed Ca
Wow…220 km to a tank…that must’ve been uphill both ways in 4wd lock with the A/C on and windows down!
Actually, its downhill in the morning and uphill in the afternoon. Regular 4WD auto if its raining or 2WD if not. Very light on the throttle and no A/C.
Most cars I've driven get around the same on that trip, so the Outlander isn't any worse in terms of fuel consumption.
 
Old Jan 13, 2011 | 01:43 PM
  #13  
UltraSmooth's Avatar
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 22
Default

I looked at my manual for my 2010 XLS it does not state that premium is required, only recommended. It says 87 or higher is required, while premium is recommended for best performance.

I'm only on my second tank (first tank was dealer filled) and used regular this tank, have noticed no difference so far.
 
Old Jan 13, 2011 | 02:26 PM
  #14  
bender031177's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 69
From: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Default

I got 522 km (all high way) to a tank with my 2009 XLS (3.0L V6) which was 10.6 l/100km. My average is about 450 km per tank or 11.41 l/100km. I cruise at 110-120 kph. This is based on records I have kept over the past six months. Mine has 37,000km on it.

I get 400 km when I am towing my camping trailer (2,000 lbs) at 100 kph.

As for the premium fuel debate, it is "recomended" not "required". The compression went from 9.5:1 to 10.5:1 which is the main reason for the premium recomend and the torgue and horse power increase. You should see more of a differance after a few years when the carbon deposits in the engine limit it's ability to retard the timing. Thats what happened to my Grandfathers '05 Galant LS V6 which also had premium recomended.
 

Last edited by bender031177; Jan 13, 2011 at 02:39 PM. Reason: New information
Old Jan 13, 2011 | 08:15 PM
  #15  
bigrroberto's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 56
From: Red Deer, Alberta
Default

Originally Posted by UltraSmooth
I looked at my manual for my 2010 XLS it does not state that premium is required, only recommended. It says 87 or higher is required, while premium is recommended for best performance.

I'm only on my second tank (first tank was dealer filled) and used regular this tank, have noticed no difference so far.
Of course you wont notice a difference. Its not like adding nos lol. Doesnt mean that it isnt making a difference. For the small amount of price difference I'd highly recommend it.

This is why...

As for the premium fuel debate, it is "recomended" not "required". The compression went from 9.5:1 to 10.5:1 which is the main reason for the premium recomend and the torgue and horse power increase. You should see more of a differance after a few years when the carbon deposits in the engine limit it's ability to retard the timing. Thats what happened to my Grandfathers '05 Galant LS V6 which also had premium recomended.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dubik
Mitsubishi Outlander
21
Jul 17, 2017 06:46 PM
sublevel4
Mitsubishi Diamante
1
Nov 3, 2009 08:49 PM
spyder4g63t
PCM & Fuel Systems
5
May 21, 2007 09:48 PM
93eclipsegsx
1st Generation
37
Mar 9, 2007 01:17 AM
newEclipse
4th Generation
1
May 6, 2005 12:47 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:03 AM.