Mitsubishi Outlander The new crossover from Mitsubishi, mixing the usefulness of an SUV with the size and convenience of a sport wagon.

Transition from oily Outlander to clean EV

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 07-08-2011, 03:06 PM
Claude_A's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Montreal area, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 481
Default

Plus new batteries twice... dream
 
  #12  
Old 07-08-2011, 04:03 PM
klas's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 492
Default

Originally Posted by Claude_A
Plus new batteries twice... dream
Just like transmission failing, oil leaks, timing belt etc... I rarely keep cars more then 8 years, so not an issue for me.
 
  #13  
Old 07-08-2011, 04:33 PM
Claude_A's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Montreal area, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 481
Default

Don't read me wrong, I would like this to work but you have been reading my experience, anything with battery has let me down way before the marketing time ( i think they count months as years).

Also in the frigid north having the battery feed the engine, heat the cabin and light the way at minus 10F when there is 6" of snow on the ground is wishful thinking.

Re-Energizing at destination is problematic since there is no infrastructure outside of you own garage.

Please let us know your true experience once the novelty has passed.

For my location in the world The best choice would be in order:
1- Direct injection Diesel (mitsubishi already make this but not for NA market as the American don't like diesel, (48 MPG.!.))
2- Alcohol fuel cell
3- Hybrid with a small diesel as APU
4- Electrical fed by something new as battery source.
 
  #14  
Old 07-08-2011, 05:41 PM
klas's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 492
Default

I hear ya, if I were you I would stay away from electrics and as I said it will not work for everyone. I'd love to replace Outlander with a hybrid/diesel version myself...
 
  #15  
Old 07-08-2011, 10:24 PM
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 75
Default

Originally Posted by Claude_A
In 5 to 6 years when the batteries are shot they will be sent to china for "Recycling" (They have a very spotty track record but they are willing to do dirty work) so you can do all the pollution in one shot rather than a bit at the time. Not including the shipping both way in a bunker fueled ship.

Also how is electricity generated in you part of the world, Coal fired power plants?

0 carbon does not exist on earth, just breathing generate CO2.

BUT it's a start... not the absolute solution.

They ship all of the LEAD back to us in the form of TOYS and CRAYONS
 
  #16  
Old 07-09-2011, 10:25 PM
codetrap's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 53
Default

Originally Posted by klas
Speaking of electricity, my car is running on hydro juice, in WA state we have several hydro power plants, so I could say that I am CO2 free, but that wasn't my priority when I was buying electric.
Actually, you're quite far in CO2 debt. Read up on the CO2 footprint from the construction of your Leaf. I bet you dollars to donuts that it's worse than if you continued to drive your Outlander for the rest of your life. Manufacturing the batteries for the Leaf is one of the dirtiest, nastiest, most toxic jobs there is. Not to mention all the "high tech" composites that went into it's construction... most of which are fossil fuel derivatives.

Far too many people only see exactly what is in front them, without looking at the costs that got them to that spot in the first place.
 
  #17  
Old 07-10-2011, 12:57 AM
klas's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 492
Default

Sure and you might be right, but I am not the one to care about this though. Although Nissan claims otherwise:

http://www.nissanusa.com/leaf-electr...r/faq/view/100

Even if the process is dirtier, which btw could be controlled, with electrics you won't be contributing to CO2 as much as oil burning car on the road during its lifetime.

Anyway, as I recall people did not have much faith in hybrid cars when they first appeared, but 10 years later Prius is the most popular car on the road. I was actually skeptical about hybrids as well and I still can't stand Prius which is more expensive then Leaf after all incentives and not nearly as efficient. Electrics today are not perfect with short range and slow recharge, but I am a strong believer that they are the wave of the future.

Would I buy electric today if I didn't have Outlander or another 2nd car? No way! Although, I know some are willing to take their chances.
 
  #18  
Old 07-10-2011, 08:21 AM
bender031177's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Posts: 69
Default

If you like Electric, Mitsubishi's next generation Outlander will be a plug in Hybrid. The best of both worlds. You will see it in three years.
 
  #19  
Old 07-10-2011, 05:32 PM
blitzkrieg79's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 141
Default

Originally Posted by klas
Sure and you might be right, but I am not the one to care about this though. Although Nissan claims otherwise:

http://www.nissanusa.com/leaf-electr...r/faq/view/100

Even if the process is dirtier, which btw could be controlled, with electrics you won't be contributing to CO2 as much as oil burning car on the road during its lifetime.

Anyway, as I recall people did not have much faith in hybrid cars when they first appeared, but 10 years later Prius is the most popular car on the road. I was actually skeptical about hybrids as well and I still can't stand Prius which is more expensive then Leaf after all incentives and not nearly as efficient. Electrics today are not perfect with short range and slow recharge, but I am a strong believer that they are the wave of the future.

Would I buy electric today if I didn't have Outlander or another 2nd car? No way! Although, I know some are willing to take their chances.
Hey Klas, congratulations on your new car. But I would have to disagree with you on a lot of your points. EV cars are basically just starting to take off and chances are that they may be a fad. Just imagine if one day OPEC countries would gang up and drop the prices of oil to below $40 per barrel, the incentive to buy an expensive EVs will be even less attractive. Nissan Leaf, basically is a $32K Nissan Versa (a $14K car) with battery packs. I know that there is a $7500 tax credit in USA but I totally disagree with it. No offense to anyone but I don't feel like sponsoring anyone a new car with my tax money, let the better/cheaper/more logical technology win. Right now EVs are not it. EVs right now are not any cleaner than gasoline counterparts either. First, batteries don't appear out of thin air, to create a batter pack is to create pollution/toxic waste. Electricity has to come from somewhere too. To recycle a battery pack is to create even more pollution to the point where average gasoline car over its life span will not pollute the Earth any more than an equivalent EV. Then there is limited driving range, rather long battery charging, suspect performance during freezing temperatures, and lack of general EV infrastructure in this country. Right now, to me, they seem like rather expensive toys. Toyota Prius works because it doesn't rely just on electricity/battery, plus its actually affordable without any tax incentives. Also, Toyota Prius is far from being the most popular car. Its actually the most popular here in USA and Japan, but even in USA it is not in the same level as Ford F150/Chevy Silverado or Toyota Camry/Honda Accord sales wise.

So basically right now EVs seem to be way overpriced. You can get a Nissan Versa for $14K, that leaves you with about $11K for fuel, and with EVs, right now, no one knows the real life time battery longevity, plus depreciation value of EVs doesn't look to be the greatest: http://green.autoblog.com/2010/08/29...might-be-high/

One good thing about pure EVs is that except the batteries, overall maintenance should be a lot cheaper. At its core, EVs are actually a lot simpler than gasoline engines. Basically you don't need transmission, no exhaust system, the need for maintenance of the engine becomes almost non-existent because there is no sophisticated gasoline engine with hundreds of different moving parts that can break down at any given time. So its not all doom and gloom but it is a rather immature technology and infrastructure. Right now I am actually more interested in technology such as Chevy Volt, actually there are rumors that Mitsu in its next generation Outlander will release a gas/electric version. Its a nice stop gap before car manufacturers figure out longer lasting batteries per charge, faster charging times, and the actual infrastructure will be in place such as EV charging stations all over the places.
 

Last edited by blitzkrieg79; 07-10-2011 at 08:38 PM.
  #20  
Old 07-10-2011, 07:08 PM
ruski's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 281
Default

Originally Posted by klas
I've recently made a transition from Outlander of 4 years ownership to an all electric LEAF and I haven't looked back after putting now over 2k miles on it. While both are different type of cars, I do have to mention that Leaf is much better then Outlander in almost every way. It has smooth and quick acceleration without and jerks and quiet inside and out and doesn't stink. The looks are somewhere between plain and ugly, so I still prefer Outlander looks, but it wasn't my priority when the gas got expensive. It lacks AWD control, but to be honest I don't miss it, at least for my daily work commute there is no need for that. Surprisingly LEAF feels very stable in wet roads where with Outlander even with AWD and upgraded tires I feel like it's hydroplaning. The acceleration is excellent with LEAF having 207 pounds of instant torque and just a hair short from V6 Outlander performance and I would probably think that it would be better then 4 cylnder version. Cornerning is impressive, I can effortlessly do 60 mph on a 25 mph freeway ramp thanks to 700 pound batteries in the floor keeping the low center of gravity where with Outlander I never really dared to try. Most importantly I no longer smell like burned oil after my commute. So, all in all it's a fun car for daily commuting and smelly and tired Outlander is now resting in the garage for those once in a while long trips.
Strange... the only time I smell like oil is after I have crawled from under my car after changing the said oil. And I like the smell too.

You probably had something wrong with your engine that it made you smell like oil during a commute.
 


Quick Reply: Transition from oily Outlander to clean EV



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:27 PM.