Usually a 100 shot con equal to 1 second in the quarter mile, give or take depending on a few things. So he'll be romping down the track with a blazing time of about 16.5-16.0.

 

you obviously have no clue what your talking about then. I speak from experiecne with a GS they are SLOWWW and even on nitrious they are still slow.

The stock v6 eclipse runs 15.1 I have seen guys on 75 shot only get 14.5 as there best. to me that is horrible in no way is that fast. Not worth spraying and putting the motor on that stress for a minimal gain.

Like I said your TSi stock is 15.0ish with a turbo back exhaust MBC and intake you could pull a low 14. I know my friends TSi had a cat back exhaust intake MBC and BOV and my car was bone stock we raced and it was dead even. my car stock runs 14.0 and he hung right next to me.

basically my car stock is 14.0 I have only spent $950 in modds and I should runs 12.8s ar around that easily that is a huge difference for not alot of money and I still am running super safe.

 

-------> for one who said my rs was stock on a 100 shot? and 2. you spend 950 dollars to make your car run whatever it runs but how much did the car itself cost?

 

i never claimed t be running 13 or whatever i just said my rs on spray is faster than my tsi right now plain and simple. you can put your stats in tell me what u had or whatever but my rs on spray is still gonna be faster than my tsi right now til i upgrade.

 

I doubt it still... If anything your RS is maybe the same as your TSi I doubt it is faster. unless your TSi is tired and high milage and beat I dont see a slow RS running with it even with N2o. I said a stock RS will run about a 17.3 a RS with all bolt ons will still only run like a 16.8 soo even with N2o your not going to see fast times IMO. and honestly I wont belive it unless you take both to a track and run them that would be proof enough ya know. Im not trying to be a jerkoff about it I just know that N2o isnt much of a bg deal espeicially on a 4 banger that is slow to begin with. like I said the stock v6 eclipse goes 15.2ish and I saw one that went 14.6 with a 75 shot and catback and intake <-- to me that is not much of a gain at all, when you take your TSi and slap on a catback and intake you will be running 14.5s or better without the spray

My point about spending $950 was that a turbo car doesnt take much to push it far. Ya I spent $22k on my car, but I could have spent $1500 on a 1G GSX and put $1000 into and hit 12s as well that is my point on that one.

 

ok.

 

like I said I wasnt trying to be a jerkoff about it[sm=smiley20.gif]

 

its cool bro. i just dont like arguing plus if i argue with you whose gonna tell me how to tune my safc2?

 

argueing is ok...no harm intended at all it is a forum and opinions is what makes things work. I dont care if we get in an arguement ill still help out where I can. Tuneing an SAFCII is something anyone could go giving the right equpment to do so, trust me its a breeze it is so much easier than I ever expected it to be

Id still like to see some track runs of those cars though I love seeing videos ya know. Ill be posting my videos when ever I can take the EVO out for a track run hopefully this summer\spring at NewEngland Dragway

 

i cant go to the track. they only give free runs on wed and i work mon-fri so i doubt ill be able to make it there .and the 420 a motor was blow so i put high compression pistons in good for spray changed the barings and built the head. as of now its running crappy because the dealership reprogramed my computer and i think they messed it up because it wont accelerate past 60. doubt your gonna see any track time on that though because i cant have 2 cars where i live so its up for grabs.