When I saw the AMS evo get dynoed they were pushing just as much torque as they were hp.. And other ones that ive seen get about 200 less for tq numbers.. And this guy is about half of his hp.. Just seems wierd that hes not getting more tq with that much hp..

 

the AMS dyno didnt show TQ on the 1000HP run it showed max HP and HP corrected

 

here look at the TQ.. As I said before it is normal. no car holds TQ at that HP even Big blocks lose TQ up there just not as much so its no guess a I4 would only get that #..... It is 100% normal.


2nd dyno sheet with the old 1.02 housing and the new 1.28 housing dyno plot on top of each other. The green is the old #s with BC 280 cams and 1.02 divided housing.
If you look at the 2 dyno #s i lost no spooling by going to a bigger housing with the divided



Now AMS with a 2.3L makes 15% more for obvious reasons here is that chart


and SAE Correction


So 810tq with the stroker. so the displacement it reason for the low Tq. But what he got was pretty close to being normal

 

10-4 on that.

But i am a little curious as to why the last run wasnt recorded.... maybe someone opened up a nitrous bottle pointing it at the intake... hmmmm (i have seen that lol)

 

saw this the other day pretty badass!

 

1000HP ON A 4G63 thats insane holys***

 

sounds like a muslkc ecar when idals..lol

 

What?


In the end, what Mike is trying to say is that the motor needs more air flow over more velocity to make more torque. A 2g DSM would act the same if it still had the 2G head over the 1G head or a stroker, cams, etc.
More air in, more air combusted, and more air out together is the key.

 

Hey let meput a 42r and make 300ftlbs and run all your asses down, haha.

 

LOL and you had to quote me....didnt you