Missing my first Mitsubishi
#23
01-10-2007, 07:20 PM
RE: Missing my first Mitsubishi
ORIGINAL: ictponder
At stock the engine puts out around 220hp, ur thinkin of the SOHC from '97 up. The vr4 puts out around 320hp stock.
At stock the engine puts out around 220hp, ur thinkin of the SOHC from '97 up. The vr4 puts out around 320hp stock.
#24
01-10-2007, 07:22 PM
RE: Missing my first Mitsubishi
ORIGINAL: EMonz57
There is a difference between crank and wheel HP. Your car is prob 247 at the crank now. Because to the wheels your only looking at about 180-190 with your mods. Did you ever see the GT eclipse Dynos they are all around 170WHP to the ground and with headers intake and exhaust they get up in the 190s.
Your car is NOT 247 WHP they prob used something that is similar to the G tech that just guesses at it and it is based on the motor not to the tires
ORIGINAL: davidmitsusrock
you mean 147 i hope^ couse even a vr-4 only runs about 230awhp stock. i would bet on your NA running 150-160fwhp.
you mean 147 i hope^ couse even a vr-4 only runs about 230awhp stock. i would bet on your NA running 150-160fwhp.
Your car is NOT 247 WHP they prob used something that is similar to the G tech that just guesses at it and it is based on the motor not to the tires
#25
01-10-2007, 07:24 PM
RE: Missing my first Mitsubishi
My bad, i figured 'hp' was the same no matter where it was on the car hehe. That seems like a lot of wasted power if ya only get 160 to the wheels if ur engine is pushin 240. So, hp is the engine and when ur talkin bout what you 'actually get' it's whp?
#26
01-10-2007, 07:26 PM
RE: Missing my first Mitsubishi
yes whp is what actually matters...there is roughly a 28% decrease from crank hp to wheel hp generally...this is important so remember it lol.
#27
01-10-2007, 08:28 PM
RE: Missing my first Mitsubishi
ORIGINAL: davidmitsusrock
why the **** did you quote me? its not my car lol...what i said was correct....and ive seen a 3g v6 with headers, intake, exhaust run on the dyno...it ran about 160fwhp
ORIGINAL: EMonz57
There is a difference between crank and wheel HP. Your car is prob 247 at the crank now. Because to the wheels your only looking at about 180-190 with your mods. Did you ever see the GT eclipse Dynos they are all around 170WHP to the ground and with headers intake and exhaust they get up in the 190s.
Your car is NOT 247 WHP they prob used something that is similar to the G tech that just guesses at it and it is based on the motor not to the tires
ORIGINAL: davidmitsusrock
you mean 147 i hope^ couse even a vr-4 only runs about 230awhp stock. i would bet on your NA running 150-160fwhp.
you mean 147 i hope^ couse even a vr-4 only runs about 230awhp stock. i would bet on your NA running 150-160fwhp.
Your car is NOT 247 WHP they prob used something that is similar to the G tech that just guesses at it and it is based on the motor not to the tires
#28
01-10-2007, 08:30 PM
RE: Missing my first Mitsubishi
ORIGINAL: davidmitsusrock
yes whp is what actually matters...there is roughly a 28% decrease from crank hp to wheel hp generally...this is important so remember it lol.
yes whp is what actually matters...there is roughly a 28% decrease from crank hp to wheel hp generally...this is important so remember it lol.
#29
01-10-2007, 08:34 PM
RE: Missing my first Mitsubishi
248awhp?^ on what a mustang dyno? on a regular dyno 220-230awhp would be more accurate right? is this stock?
#30
01-10-2007, 08:38 PM
RE: Missing my first Mitsubishi
ORIGINAL: davidmitsusrock
248awhp?^ on what a mustang dyno? on a regular dyno 220-230awhp would be more accurate right? is this stock?
248awhp?^ on what a mustang dyno? on a regular dyno 220-230awhp would be more accurate right? is this stock?