I was sitting in my business class flipping though my text book becuase I dont like my teacher(she is a red neck nascar fan) any who I came across this page in my book




I deiced to read it and just to give you guys a taste of it

"Abnormal things are happening in normal, IL, home of mitsubishi's only us plant. In 1998 the plant's productivity was the lowest of all car factories in america....about 20 percent of the vehicles being produced needed some kind of repair or adjustment"

I then though to my self in 98 mitsubishi was making the eclipse, galant, dimante, montero, endevor, and I think the 3000gt. 6 divided by 100% is 16.7 percent... and I am pretty sure it wasent the montero or galant that was a piece of ****. Just figured I would share.

 

hahaha funny stuff but even without that article we all know that is the truth based on DSMs alone lol.

 

Well with that last statement of "and I am pretty sure it wasent the montero or galant that was a piece of ****." You haven't worked on a Galant or dealt with the problems that they are...

 

true... but I know how finickey eclipses are lol

 

you cant forget for the most part galants are eclipses with a big body

 

... the galant dosent use a 4g63 or a 420a?

 

galant VR4 is a 4g63 and newer galants are 3G eclipses with the 4g64 and 6G72

 

I was gonna say the newer Galants are 4G64's but I don't think any use the 420A

 

The artical isant talking about 90-93 cars or 2000+ cars... its talking about 2g cars, 98's specifically.

 

You can't say that the Eclipse sucks just because of that article. 20% is average for most auto makers, and being that Mitsubishi didn't sell as well as others is no surprise. A lot of people prefer domestic vehicles. Now, take 20% of Mitsubishi's sales and compare it to 20% of Ford or Chevy. Also take into consideration that Mitsubishi does build their cars better than any domestic company, as with most foreign makers. I wouldn't worry about it! Mitsubishi FTW!