http://www.mustangforums.com/m_26211...tm.htm#2621238

nuff said.... [&:]

 

Oh boy....here we go!!

 

Yay get to see a bunch of import bashing...give em hell morbid! this shall be interesting.

 

I'm on your side man... lol I'm not the one that posted that... I'm the one right below him calling BS

 

Oh, well what is your view?

 

it's all up to the driver... end of story.

they both have equal horse.... the stang has about 40 more lbs of torque and a slight wieght advantage... but people have been claiming they put like 850,000 lengths on them and it's rediculous, I see no more than a1 length win to the stang stock for stock... only because of launch issues... from a roll it should be neck and neckwith the loser only leaving fault to his driving

stang GT= 13.9-14.3 @ 98.XX=MPH

Eclipse GT= 14.1-14.5 @ 100+MPH

not to mention the eclipse would do circles around the stang on a road coarse

 

I also doubt if the 'stang caught up after the eclipse was a car length ahead that the eclipse was actually pushing it at all. The Eclipse proved his point and let it die. Notice the guy didn't finish the story and never said that the Eclipse tried to catch or pass again. Need to call BS on ALL that....

 

I got kicked out of another stang forum for defending makes otherthan the "almighty mustang" [&:]
I don't want to overdue it... this stang forum is cool, been there for a long time... better to just say it like it is and wait for him to become an ***...

 

I'd still call his bluff. But I am an ******* like that I guess...

 

It was prolly a GS, and its sad to say but theres a lot of people out there that think there gs's are fast and prolly would race a mustang gt..