2nd Generation This includes all Eclipses, and Talons built from 1995-1999

Tubro vs. N/A

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 22, 2005 | 09:38 PM
  #1  
Bonezz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 5
Default Tubro vs. N/A

alright i know turbo is fast, BUT it costs out the ***... now how much better would having a turbo rather than going n/a?
im leaning towards n/a because of the money. what is everyones opinion on this?

in all i wanna know what would be better for the money for the most HP
 
Old Nov 22, 2005 | 10:01 PM
  #2  
Lil red's Avatar
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 868
From:
Default RE: Tubro vs. N/A

Turbos respond better to bolt on upgrades than a n/a.
 
Old Nov 23, 2005 | 12:05 AM
  #3  
slow420a's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,337
Default RE: Tubro vs. N/A

n/a mods are alot like masturbating... i bet you can fuiger the rest out on your own.
 
Old Nov 23, 2005 | 12:22 AM
  #4  
Dyno_Man's Avatar
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 155
From: New York City...now residing in Fort Worth, Texas
Default RE: Tubro vs. N/A

it may be fun but in the end ur still screwing urself LMAO!!!
 
Old Nov 23, 2005 | 10:34 AM
  #5  
slow420a's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,337
Default RE: Tubro vs. N/A


ORIGINAL: Dyno_Man

it may be fun but in the end ur still screwing urself LMAO!!!
you win a cookie!!!!!
 
Old Nov 23, 2005 | 10:38 AM
  #6  
eclipsed4u's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 862
Default RE: Tubro vs. N/A

when you go n/a, you will run into a barrier. there will come a time when you have nothing else you can do to the engine, and you still probably won't break 200whp.

with a turbo, you can keep upgrading parts and keep making more and more power.

and check out the prices, building the engine will run you about the same, if not more, than turboing the car.
 
Old Nov 23, 2005 | 01:51 PM
  #7  
slow420a's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,337
Default RE: Tubro vs. N/A


ORIGINAL: eclipsed4u
.... and then you are stuck at 220whp.
[:@]
 
Old Nov 23, 2005 | 03:31 PM
  #8  
Dyno_Man's Avatar
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 155
From: New York City...now residing in Fort Worth, Texas
Default RE: Tubro vs. N/A

you win a cookie!!!!!
YEEEEEESSSSS!!!!!! GIVE ME MY GOD DAYUM COOKIE!!!!
 
Old Nov 23, 2005 | 03:35 PM
  #9  
eclipsed4u's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 862
Default RE: Tubro vs. N/A


ORIGINAL: slow420a


ORIGINAL: eclipsed4u
.... and then you are stuck at 220whp.
[:@]
fixed it.
 
Old Nov 23, 2005 | 06:50 PM
  #10  
TheAdvocate's Avatar
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,323
From: Baraboo, WI
Default RE: Tubro vs. N/A

In all... If you like the eclipse because of the looks and drive like your grandma... Get a n/a... If you want one that you can drive to look good and have speed... Get a turbo...
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:09 PM.