Tubro vs. N/A

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Nov 23, 2005 | 07:15 PM

#11

slow420a

Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2005

Posts: 2,337

RE: Tubro vs. N/A

Quote:

ORIGINAL: eclipsed4u

Quote:

ORIGINAL: slow420a

Quote:

ORIGINAL: eclipsed4u
.... and then you are stuck at 220whp.

[:@]

fixed it.

built stroked 420a maybe MAYBE 200 at the crank

Edit: not stroked but built with high compression pistons, 5 angle valve job and cams.

Nov 23, 2005 | 08:55 PM

#12

Dyno_Man

Joined: Dec 2004

Posts: 155

From: New York City...now residing in Fort Worth, Texas

RE: Tubro vs. N/A

doesnt a turbo model need a lil more maitenance than N/A?

Nov 25, 2005 | 02:43 AM

#13

eclipsed4u

Senior Member

Joined: Sep 2005

Posts: 862

RE: Tubro vs. N/A

Quote:

ORIGINAL: Dyno_Man

doesnt a turbo model need a lil more maitenance than N/A?

if you take care of the car like its supposed to be taken care of, then there would be no real change in maintenance. you would probably make sure you changed the oil on time.

Nov 25, 2005 | 03:37 PM

#14

TheAdvocate

Joined: Aug 2005

Posts: 2,323

From: Baraboo, WI

RE: Tubro vs. N/A

You could need a lot of maintenance on a n/a if you dont take care of it and beat it to ****... Same with any car.. Just the turbo's usually get beat more...