V6 GSX???
Thread Starter
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 21
From:
RE: V6 GSX???
ORIGINAL: Sebba
Wait a sec.... there IS a TT3g eclipse going around... its fugly as ****... but it was defenatly not that way from the factory.
Wait a sec.... there IS a TT3g eclipse going around... its fugly as ****... but it was defenatly not that way from the factory.
Also I'm not much of a gear head so I got a few question burning in my head baout this v6 thing (cause Man thats sounds like it would be as **** to drive)
Didn't Dodge/Chrysler make a shadow with a turbo v6? or was that only the 2.2 4 cyl... and about this Galiant .... I am really thinking I want a v6 in my GSX
, I know you all think I am dumb or nuts, but imagine if you could find one that would fit
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 12,084
RE: V6 GSX???
ORIGINAL: eqnish
Whats is a TT3g....
Also I'm not much of a gear head so I got a few question burning in my head baout this v6 thing (cause Man thats sounds like it would be as **** to drive)
Didn't Dodge/Chrysler make a shadow with a turbo v6? or was that only the 2.2 4 cyl... and about this Galiant .... I am really thinking I want a v6 in my GSX, I know you all think I am dumb or nuts, but imagine if you could find one that would fit
ORIGINAL: Sebba
Wait a sec.... there IS a TT3g eclipse going around... its fugly as ****... but it was defenatly not that way from the factory.
Wait a sec.... there IS a TT3g eclipse going around... its fugly as ****... but it was defenatly not that way from the factory.
Also I'm not much of a gear head so I got a few question burning in my head baout this v6 thing (cause Man thats sounds like it would be as **** to drive)
Didn't Dodge/Chrysler make a shadow with a turbo v6? or was that only the 2.2 4 cyl... and about this Galiant .... I am really thinking I want a v6 in my GSX
, I know you all think I am dumb or nuts, but imagine if you could find one that would fit
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 12,084
RE: V6 GSX???
ORIGINAL: davidmitsusrock
eh hem..... 4g63<6g72TT
evo 8<vr-4
all opinions i suppose but i wouldnt say the 4g63 is better then the 6g72tt.
eh hem..... 4g63<6g72TT
evo 8<vr-4
all opinions i suppose but i wouldnt say the 4g63 is better then the 6g72tt.
When I see a street form VR4 running low 8s and mid 7s then I will change my statment but for now yours is completely false (not the the VR4 is a bad motor with not potencial it just is NOT as far along as the 4G63)
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,430
From: Colorado Springs, CO.
RE: V6 GSX???
ORIGINAL: EMonz57
completely not true. it takes more money more work and more of a pain in the ***** to make a High HP 6G72TT. the EVO9 has far out proven the VR4 in only 3 years and the VR4 has had 10 years and is just not catching up the the EVO8 abilities.
When I see a street form VR4 running low 8s and mid 7s then I will change my statment but for now yours is completely false (not the the VR4 is a bad motor with not potencial it just is NOT as far along as the 4G63)
ORIGINAL: davidmitsusrock
eh hem..... 4g63<6g72TT
evo 8<vr-4
all opinions i suppose but i wouldnt say the 4g63 is better then the 6g72tt.
eh hem..... 4g63<6g72TT
evo 8<vr-4
all opinions i suppose but i wouldnt say the 4g63 is better then the 6g72tt.
When I see a street form VR4 running low 8s and mid 7s then I will change my statment but for now yours is completely false (not the the VR4 is a bad motor with not potencial it just is NOT as far along as the 4G63)
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 12,084
RE: V6 GSX???
maybe I should vlearify alittle. the VR4 motor responds better to small mods but it becomse a pain to work on and seriouls upgrade. not to mention the fact that the car weights 3800lbs over the EVO which is about 3200LBS and all the TQ from the VR4 will make it harder to drive hell they get bad TQ steer stock. and top end power the 4G63 has been better for as long as I can remember. we all know that the highest HP 4G63 is more power than the highest 3000gt
