Mitsubishi 3000GT During it's production run, and after, the 3000GT was a pure sports car offering forced induction and all wheel drive, as well as smooth aerodynamic styling.

3000GT vs. Evolution

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 08-23-2007, 02:02 PM
Dusty Eclipse's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: 34669
Posts: 4,445
Default RE: 3000GT vs. Evolution

End result:
3000GT = Touring car, made for highways and long trips.
EVO = Rally car, designed for cornering and acceleration.
 
  #12  
Old 08-23-2007, 03:35 PM
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location:
Posts: 42
Default RE: 3000GT vs. Evolution

I would definitely go with a VR-4 it is nowhere near as expensive as the evo. I got my 95 for 3600.00 and the only things wrong were the turbos and that it had been sitting for three years in my uncle’s garage. It still ran when I bought it but I took the induction system off. For the car to be in great condition my investment will only be about 8700.00. P.S. never buy from eBay that is why my favorite car sits once more.
 
  #13  
Old 08-23-2007, 04:41 PM
Sebba's Avatar
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 16,176
Default RE: 3000GT vs. Evolution

I think thats a little too general. I have bought cars off ebay and so have members of my family, all without a problem. I think better advice would be "be careful if your dealing with ebay" agree?
 
  #14  
Old 08-23-2007, 06:46 PM
Dusty Eclipse's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: 34669
Posts: 4,445
Default RE: 3000GT vs. Evolution

Absolutely
 
  #15  
Old 08-28-2007, 05:04 PM
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2
Default RE: 3000GT vs. Evolution

ORIGINAL: thestealth

Just a side note...everyone's opinions are different...don't let this turn into a flame thread because of that.

They are two totally different cars designed for totally different things. The VR4's were designed to be a GT car, and they fit that role perfectly. They fit two people in comfort, they will hold as much luggage as 2 people need for a weekend trip, they can cover many miles comfortably and quickly.

EVO's well, they're rally cars...and they fit their role perfectly as well.

We are talking about relatively stock vehicles. Any car can be made fast...so that is a moot point.
i agree with this dude.
 
  #16  
Old 08-29-2007, 08:46 AM
jason clipse's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: delray beach fl
Posts: 438
Default RE: 3000GT vs. Evolution

it dont matter how much money u put into ur car there will be someone out there that is faster than u period
 
  #17  
Old 10-30-2007, 08:52 AM
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4
Default RE: 3000GT vs. Evolution

vr-4's are definetly cheaper then evo's i paid 2100 for my vr-4 all it needs is a water pump and wheel bearing it still drives great and is super fast. i love that thing but evo's are really sexy
 
  #18  
Old 10-30-2007, 11:26 AM
Sebba's Avatar
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 16,176
Default RE: 3000GT vs. Evolution

This thread is old dude...
 
  #19  
Old 11-18-2007, 07:07 PM
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 8
Default RE: 3000GT vs. Evolution

evo ftw
 
  #20  
Old 11-18-2007, 07:32 PM
thestealth's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,197
Default RE: 3000GT vs. Evolution

Thanks for adding so much to the conversation...
 


Quick Reply: 3000GT vs. Evolution



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:47 AM.