Off Topic A place for you car junkies to boldly post off topic. Almost anything goes.

well guys, guess what

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 01-13-2008, 11:02 PM
BrunoBoy650's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,563
Default RE: well guys, guess what

ORIGINAL: nick_200321

tell him to hurry his *** up i wanna see that **** lol
lol, well hes coming over now, he is 2 hours away, but yha, turns out after the track, he took off, and i was wondering where he went, well he called me, saying hes leaving a strip club right now ahahaha
 
  #22  
Old 01-14-2008, 07:31 AM
EMonz57's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12,084
Default RE: well guys, guess what

Ya NESpeed's old GSX had similar mods and ran a 12.9 and a consistant 13.1-13.3. what were the 60 foot times. if they wernt 1.8 or better than that is killing you and your shifting prob. also what are your traps? I bet it is the drivers making the car slower but we can tell better if we see the rest of the time slips #s
 
  #23  
Old 01-14-2008, 09:22 AM
BrunoBoy650's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,563
Default RE: well guys, guess what

ORIGINAL: EMonz57

Ya NESpeed's old GSX had similar mods and ran a 12.9 and a consistant 13.1-13.3. what were the 60 foot times. if they wernt 1.8 or better than that is killing you and your shifting prob. also what are your traps? I bet it is the drivers making the car slower but we can tell better if we see the rest of the time slips #s
oh deng, thats way faster than my times lol. uhm ill post the time slip, but i dont have a scanner right now, so i'll post it as i see it on the slip.

Car:262 Left Lane
Dial-in: .00
Reaction:.472(i went on green instead of on the last yellow)
I1 60":2.025
I2 120":6.089
I3 180":9.544
MPH(I3):blank
I4:blank
E.T: 14.948
MPH:88.849



Car:262 Right Lane
Dial-in: .00
Reaction:.333(i went on yellow-ish)
I1 60":2.171(i bogged launch)
I2 120":6.265
I3 180":9.725
MPH(I3):blank
I4:12.626
E.T: 15.155
MPH:89.715





 
  #24  
Old 01-14-2008, 09:57 AM
tidus10's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location:
Posts: 2,846
Default RE: well guys, guess what

no MPH? wow even the clocks shut off on ya
 
  #25  
Old 01-14-2008, 10:03 AM
lhausi2's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location:
Posts: 714
Default RE: well guys, guess what

nah it's the last number on the timeslips which is 88 for the first one and 89 for the 2nd one, and ya it looks like the the 60 ft times aren't too good, but how's that vid coming?haha
 
  #26  
Old 01-14-2008, 10:09 AM
BrunoBoy650's Avatar
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,563
Default RE: well guys, guess what

My friend said he'll do it later..........[:@] ahaha, i wanna see it too, it was only my second time running a car at the track, and the first time with my car. the first time was with a civic and i ran 16.6 ahaha.......... oh well. ill get it up asap
 
  #27  
Old 01-14-2008, 05:25 PM
EMonz57's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12,084
Default RE: well guys, guess what

your 60fts are worse then TEs with a RWD car. that is where most of your problem is. a AWD car like this should pull at least a 1.8XX I was getting 1.84s in teh Evo and I was spinning the fronts off the line and I was only getting 12.3s with a car capible of 12.0s the way it was and a little more tuning should have been easily capible of 11.8s. My 60fts were considered bad for an Evo since average is low 1.7s. I did a 2.4 60ft in one pass and only hit 14.5 so with a better 60ft your car is aleast capible of 13s I bet. and that is without figuring how slow you might be shifting
 
  #28  
Old 01-14-2008, 05:45 PM
TheEngineer's Avatar
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 11,758
Default RE: well guys, guess what

no mike something is wrong. Look at the traps of under 90mph. I had traps around a consistant low 90's and that i think should be a low 14 to maybe high 14. But traps that low wont get into 13's.

And bruno just so you know the best R/T is .500, and has nothing to do with you 1/4 mile time. The two biggest factors are gonna be your 60 ft and you shifting. like mike said that 60ft should be around a 1.8. What rpm are you launching at and are you just dumping it or riding off it a bit.
 
  #29  
Old 01-14-2008, 05:53 PM
EMonz57's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12,084
Default RE: well guys, guess what

ORIGINAL: TheEngineer

no mike something is wrong. Look at the traps of under 90mph. I had traps around a consistant low 90's and that i think should be a low 14 to maybe high 14. But traps that low wont get into 13's.

And bruno just so you know the best R/T is .500, and has nothing to do with you 1/4 mile time. The two biggest factors are gonna be your 60 ft and you shifting. like mike said that 60ft should be around a 1.8. What rpm are you launching at and are you just dumping it or riding off it a bit.
Your nt going to get 60fts like him so your car will trap more than a AWD car. My car traps low for a car that runs low 12s because of the 60ft. On all my runs , and his runs the worse the 60ft the higher the traps were (for the most part). Yea his MPh are low but I still think he is fast than a high 14 eppecailly with his mods. Why do you think I also said "this is without figureing shifting issues" because he is most likly not shifting to quick if is struggling to pull a good 60ft in that MO
 
  #30  
Old 01-14-2008, 07:20 PM
TheEngineer's Avatar
Super Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 11,758
Default RE: well guys, guess what

yea i agree about it being faster than a high 14. Im thinking probably a low 14. I guess he could get into the high 13's because of that huge difference the 60' should make. a big part of keiths times (including the really good 60') is the powershifting.
 


Quick Reply: well guys, guess what



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:55 AM.