420a vs 4g63
#1
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Which engine is better? ive heard many different things from many different places about which engine is actually better take away the turbo of the 4g63 and which one really is better? some say 420a and other 4g63? but down to the actualy engine which is better?
(all i hear on this site seems to be "should have bought a 4g63 eclipse instead of the rs or gs")
so regardless of the turbo which wins?
please if anyone knows any statisics place them here (non turbo 4g63!)
(all i hear on this site seems to be "should have bought a 4g63 eclipse instead of the rs or gs")
so regardless of the turbo which wins?
please if anyone knows any statisics place them here (non turbo 4g63!)
#2
![Default](/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
This question is ****ing stupid.
For n/a the 420a probably makes more power, but it sucks.
You can't just say "Oh take the turbo off the 4G63 and see how it compares" that is retarded. Bottom line its a better engine, and will always out perform the 420a. Find me a 1000whp 420a.
For n/a the 420a probably makes more power, but it sucks.
You can't just say "Oh take the turbo off the 4G63 and see how it compares" that is retarded. Bottom line its a better engine, and will always out perform the 420a. Find me a 1000whp 420a.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post