2nd Generation This includes all Eclipses, and Talons built from 1995-1999

420a vs 4g63

Old Mar 7, 2009 | 10:00 PM
  #1  
KaiserEclipse's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 180
From: LaGrange Ky
Default 420a vs 4g63

Which engine is better? ive heard many different things from many different places about which engine is actually better take away the turbo of the 4g63 and which one really is better? some say 420a and other 4g63? but down to the actualy engine which is better?

(all i hear on this site seems to be "should have bought a 4g63 eclipse instead of the rs or gs")

so regardless of the turbo which wins?

please if anyone knows any statisics place them here (non turbo 4g63!)
 
Old Mar 7, 2009 | 10:08 PM
  #2  
Sebba's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 16,176
From: Austin, TX
Default

This question is ****ing stupid.

For n/a the 420a probably makes more power, but it sucks.

You can't just say "Oh take the turbo off the 4G63 and see how it compares" that is retarded. Bottom line its a better engine, and will always out perform the 420a. Find me a 1000whp 420a.
 
Old Mar 8, 2009 | 07:12 PM
  #3  
TheEngineer's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,758
From:
Default

^^^exactly. A compete built 420a is very capable. However it has yet to outperform a 4g63.
 
Old Mar 9, 2009 | 06:29 PM
  #4  
KaiserEclipse's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 180
From: LaGrange Ky
Default

I was just curious as to the specs of the engines and in general which is better, thanks for the input
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RCJr9186
2nd Generation
14
Dec 8, 2006 06:21 PM
eclipse27
1st Generation
13
Mar 28, 2006 11:15 PM
unimaginable06
2nd Generation
18
Jan 19, 2006 07:03 PM
get435
2nd Generation
8
Sep 29, 2005 10:07 AM
get435
2nd Generation
5
Feb 20, 2005 06:40 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:24 AM.