3rd Generation This includes all Eclipses built from 2000-2005

Mitsubishi Mistake?

Old Apr 6, 2006 | 09:36 PM
  #11  
5Tizzle's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,387
From:
Default RE: Mitsubishi Mistake?


ORIGINAL: estraw

another thing... look at half the people driving eclipses (mainly 2nd and 3rd gen). notice something?? there mostly in their 40's and up... people at that age just want something reliable, they dont care if its got 290 stock HP like the Evo


The only people ive seen driving a second gen are under 30...
 
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 09:47 PM
  #12  
EMonz57's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 12,084
Default RE: Mitsubishi Mistake?


ORIGINAL: estraw

another thing... look at half the people driving eclipses (mainly 2nd and 3rd gen). notice something?? there mostly in their 40's and up... people at that age just want something reliable, they dont care if its got 290 stock HP like the Evo
Ya man I never see 2G turbos driven buy anyone older than 25. it is a high school kids car(no offence they are just cheap) and they are not reliable if you want a reliable car you buy a toyota DSMs are known to be under the knife 24/7 and 6G72s were made weak to lose the poblems of the 2G turbo models.

The 2Gs seem to break alot when upgraded, im sure mitsu look at it like well this wont happen here since 1) N\A cant be High HP without alot of $$$ and 2) 210 HP in 2000 and 2001 was the normal thing that was the time of the Vtech civic being 160hp and most cars of its time of birth were not much higher than that. Now honda has surpassed that hence the 4G being alot more as well. So that being said the 3G mechanically might be more of a daily driver car for an older person it is rather reliable and for the younger croud it cant be modded to easily and if you have the $$$ to mod it and break it then chances are you have the $$$ to fix it
 
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 11:55 PM
  #13  
ictponder's Avatar
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 597
From:
Default RE: Mitsubishi Mistake?

I'm 25 and I'm the only person in this entire town (population 18,000) that has an Eclipse And I've only seen a handful of 3G's while driving through this state.
 
Old Apr 7, 2006 | 12:04 AM
  #14  
Sanguinius's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,874
From: Norfolk, VA
Default RE: Mitsubishi Mistake?

Dude your state sucks LOL... I see Eclipses all the time though usually the 3G and the 2G with a spattering of 1G's running around.
 
Old Apr 7, 2006 | 12:07 AM
  #15  
EMonz57's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 12,084
Default RE: Mitsubishi Mistake?

ya man 3Gs galore around here and 2Gs are taking over the world I think, that is why I like the 1G the best
 
Old Apr 7, 2006 | 12:08 AM
  #16  
TheEngineer's Avatar
Super Moderator
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,758
From:
Default RE: Mitsubishi Mistake?

yea i see eclipses everywhere. Expecially the 3g's.

When they were making the gs's they werent trying to go for performance. They wanted a more reliable and good looking car.
 
Old Apr 7, 2006 | 01:12 AM
  #17  
2001gt3.0's Avatar
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 56
From:
Default RE: Mitsubishi Mistake?

I have also heard where Mitsubishi was trying to get a car geared more towards adult buyers. For a 3.0 liter engine it could have had more power from factory but I feel it was weak incase sales were down, they could upgrade the power for future sales. Some companies practice this already like the the GM's Pontiac GTO, it had 350 hp in 2004, after a bad sales year, they somehow found a 400 hp motor for it.

The BMW M3 and M roadster had 240hp back @ 1995 with a 3.0 engine
Honda Accord 3.0 liter 244hp 211 lb-ft
Camery 3.3 liter 255 hp 240 lb-ft
Z-4 3.0 liter 262 hp 232 lb ft
Lexus IS 300 3.0 liter 215 hp 218 lb-ft
Audi A4 3.2 3.1 liter 255 hp 243 lb-ft
Porsche boxer 2.7 liter( Base )236 hp (S) 3.2 liter 276 hp
Dodge stealth 3.0 liter 222 hp non-turbo with multi valve engine(?)

If the Eclipse had sold poorly, it may have had the power upgrades. It was always such a popular car that Mitsubishi just left it alone until the GTS. I don't know for sure but that's what I expect from car companies.
 
Old Apr 7, 2006 | 10:08 AM
  #18  
3clips3gen's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 26
From:
Default RE: Mitsubishi Mistake?

Alot of old people where I live driving the 3g spyders. I have the only 3g at my school =)
 
Old Apr 7, 2006 | 04:26 PM
  #19  
mysterio2099's Avatar
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 836
From:
Default RE: Mitsubishi Mistake?

dude, I live in a city with 7,500 people (as of a 2000 census), and we have at least seven 2Gs, 8-10 3Gs, and one 1G .. and this is just what I've seen during my 5 minutes in and out before and after work... so I'm sure there are much more. Now, out of these... I've seen 3 that were fixed up a bit, and it wasn't that much.. except for this one white 2G eclipse.. had full body kit and air bags... **** like that.. it was bouncing around the walmart parking lot one night.. friend of mine told me he saw it off in a ditch wrecked one morning on his way to work
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
miikka
General Mitsubishi Chat
3
Apr 5, 2010 09:24 AM
XIOZZYIX
Mitsubishi 3000GT
6
Nov 18, 2009 09:04 AM
FAX68
Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Sportback
3
Feb 6, 2009 12:41 PM
UTREVO
2nd Generation
10
Nov 14, 2006 10:56 AM
venum
New Members Area
0
Aug 3, 2005 11:58 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:45 PM.