question about 3g
ORIGINAL: slvr_eclipse
No offense to all you 3g owners but, What the hell was mitsu thinking designing that? IMO they F*ed up. I dont know anybody who likes that style.
No offense to all you 3g owners but, What the hell was mitsu thinking designing that? IMO they F*ed up. I dont know anybody who likes that style.
they only kept the door design but they made it less agressive looking. the origanal concept looked alot like a ferarri front to back of course never made it though
why would you ask that on a mitsubishi forum? are you metaly challenged? honestly i like the 3rd gen yes you are intitled to your own opinion but use stupidity with causion please. i know lots fo people that like that body style look at my sig obviously there was enough to get a meet going and go to www.club3g.com and look at the members list...i swear.
ORIGINAL: davidmitsusrock
to www.club3g.com and look at the members list...i swear.
to www.club3g.com and look at the members list...i swear.
But stock the car really is a joke, I like the look but it lacks power even the GT and GTS trim and the handleing is the worst of any "sports" car I have driven. It was built for luxary and it pulls that off well but most people like the eclipse as a sports car to build and the 3G needs alot of things to change to make it a contender but it is not impossible
ORIGINAL: slvr_eclipse
No offense to all you 3g owners but, What the hell was mitsu thinking designing that? IMO they F*ed up. I dont know anybody who likes that style.
No offense to all you 3g owners but, What the hell was mitsu thinking designing that? IMO they F*ed up. I dont know anybody who likes that style.
the fact that its a 100 times better overall in chassis design, reliability, ergonomics, and overall refinement?
or the exterior style?
if you're judging on style, you have a lot to learn about cars. Style is objective, so what you dont like someone else will love. and in the long term it's relatively unimportant. No one ever praised toyota for its camrys, but they sure sell a helluva lot of them.
the V6 is light years better than any turbo 4 in terms of overall drivability, smoothness, torque, etc. The turbo 4s never sold that well in the first place (the GSX never accounted for more that 7 percent total eclipse sales), which is why mitsu killed it off. So if you want to blame someone for changing the overall "attitude" of the car, blame the consumers for buying what they wanted.
Honestly I think a lot of people were just buying from the name that eclipse had established the 2 models before. I could really care less about its "reliability, ergonomics" if the thing is butt ugly. There must be a reason why they took the 2g style and modernized it.
Emonz57 do you have a link to the concept? I would like to see it actually.
Emonz57 do you have a link to the concept? I would like to see it actually.
ORIGINAL: slvr_eclipse
Honestly I think a lot of people were just buying from the name that eclipse had established the 2 models before. I could really care less about its "reliability, ergonomics" if the thing is butt ugly. There must be a reason why they took the 2g style and modernized it.
Emonz57 do you have a link to the concept? I would like to see it actually.
Honestly I think a lot of people were just buying from the name that eclipse had established the 2 models before. I could really care less about its "reliability, ergonomics" if the thing is butt ugly. There must be a reason why they took the 2g style and modernized it.
Emonz57 do you have a link to the concept? I would like to see it actually.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GSXEX Knubbe
Off Topic
6
May 18, 2007 07:57 AM



