Ricer or not?

Old Sep 30, 2008 | 04:39 PM
  #1  
Mike21's Avatar
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 229
From:
Default Ricer or not?

What’s up? So one of my buddies and I had a small argument of what is considered a “Ricer”. He seems to think that it’s mostly imports, including his 300ZX as well as my Evo, depending on exhaust type.

What do you guys think?

What do you consider a ricer?
 
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 05:12 PM
  #2  
Sebba's Avatar
Banned
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 16,176
From: Austin, TX
Default RE: Ricer or not?

Rice is all about the attitude.

There are 1000whp Supras that have a 5 inch exhaust, that doesn't count.

Bodykits and excessive exterior modification are ricey.

Things like factory aero kits are not, and tasteful add ons such as a little lip here and there are okay.

Most modification to the headlights or tail lights are ricey, they include alteeeeeezas.

Buying your performance parts from eBay is ricey.
 
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 06:07 PM
  #3  
EMonz57's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 12,084
Default RE: Ricer or not?

I agree the Evo is pretty ricey. No offence but I would have said that when I owned one as well. Exhaust really cant be considered rice unless you just put on a fart can and nothing. I mean my Supra has 4 inch exhaust and it is dead quiet unless I am above 5k. I mean quiet as in my GFs 01 GT spyder eclipse makes more noise at cruising speeds with stock exhaust. Not to mention how can that be considered rice when you doing a 30HP mod like that. same with the Evo really.

If you heard my Evo before i sold it you would call it rice all the way. Evos sound like complete **** with heavy mods. Worse and louder than a honda IMO lol.

The 300zx is far from rice IMO. it is a very bland plain car. The Supra could be considered rice for the meer fact that every ricerboy loves them (like the Evo and skyline)
 
Old Sep 30, 2008 | 09:11 PM
  #4  
Kaede.Noir's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,832
From: Calexico, CA
Default RE: Ricer or not?

To me ricer is trying to make your ride look what its not with the fewest ammount of care and money on it... ie... trying to make a honda look WAY faster than it is... when its not, not caring about details and paying 200 for a paintjob... Ricer... is like in the music world what you would call a poseur... but thats mo
 
Old Oct 1, 2008 | 03:59 AM
  #5  
silvercoupe97's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,430
From: Colorado Springs, CO.
Default RE: Ricer or not?

Rice to me is when a car is setup to emulate a fast car and when the car is all about form over function. Like Mike said, his Supra has a 4" exhaust....but it's functional. It's there to support other mods, not make it seem like it's faster than it really is.
Rice used to be about the motor because 4 cylinders were mainly an Asian product and were hated by American car enthusiasts because they made better 4 cylinders. So back in the day Asian = rice and rice = less than 8 cylinders. Now rice = all show and no go. But there are still folks who relate anything smaller than a V8 to rice.
 
Old Oct 1, 2008 | 02:43 PM
  #6  
Mike21's Avatar
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 229
From:
Default RE: Ricer or not?

Yeah I agree with ya, rice, IMO is a series of interior and exterior upgrades that doesn’t serve a purpose in performance.
I can see why the Evo could be considered rice but everything on that car is functional, down to the large rear wind that serves a purpose in aerodynamics to the ventilated hood that allows heat to exit the engine bay. To me that’s not rice, that performance.
 
Old Oct 1, 2008 | 06:24 PM
  #7  
EMonz57's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 12,084
Default RE: Ricer or not?

That stuff serves its purpose yes. However the Evo is just one of those cars that will always scream ricer. Esspecailly with the huge price drop and all the younger (ricier) kids picking them up.

I mean when I was in FL shortly after buying mine. I went to a big meet. hundreds of cars were there about 15 Evos. I was talking to one kid he was 18. He has a FMIC , stock exhaust and a Megan tubular manifold with an SAFC and NO wideband. So I ask him why the FMIC and manifold but no exhaust? He goes oh they look better. Im like ok well they arent doing you any good the way your car is setup. Then I noticed the SAFC and I go oh who tuned it, he say I did. Im like oh yea what AFR's are you set too? He goes huh? I say do you have a wideband? he goes oh no I just can tell when its too lean by how it feels.

So I end by saying well good luck, hope your motor lasts
 
Old Oct 2, 2008 | 12:59 AM
  #8  
Mike21's Avatar
Thread Starter
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 229
From:
Default RE: Ricer or not?

Yeah you are right, it's the younger generation that puts the car in the "ricer" category. I've always been about functionality over bling, but I'll keep my car real and about performance.

I even saw an Evo a few days ago with a wing big enough to make a blue whale jealous. I knew he was just trying to get a "cool" look, but didn't think he was so successful.
 
Old Oct 6, 2008 | 05:18 PM
  #9  
darknigh7th's Avatar
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 752
From: Marshall, TX
Default RE: Ricer or not?

or a 90's honda prelude wanting to race my gsx, all he had was a fart can and a tach that looked like a pizza pan on his dashboard.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mitsuant
Off Topic
1
Dec 7, 2006 12:55 PM
tidus10
Off Topic
31
Mar 19, 2006 03:01 AM
Dyno_Man
Off Topic
31
Dec 10, 2005 01:30 AM
Evo_8
Off Topic
7
Nov 9, 2005 07:08 PM
proteusx301
Street/Strip
16
Oct 16, 2005 04:42 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:25 PM.