Intake, Headers and Exhaust Custom Exhaust? New Headers? Need Opinions on Intakes? Discuss making your ride breathe better here.
View Poll Results: A poll
AEM Cold Air Intake
66.67%
AEM Short Ram Air Intake
33.33%
Voters: 3. You may not vote on this poll

Short Ram vs. Cold Air

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 05-17-2006, 01:17 PM
2000_4G64's Avatar
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2
Default Short Ram vs. Cold Air

looking for some added performance and a better sound out of the stock 2.4L but I'm a student and can't decide whether or not its worht the extra $$$ for the full cold air... obviously better performance out of the cold air, but what is the best bang for my buck?
 
  #2  
Old 05-17-2006, 08:32 PM
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 186
Default RE: Short Ram vs. Cold Air

cold air is better but i doubt your going to actually feel a power difference. If your on a budget just go with short ram. The down fall with cold air intakes is you have to change the filter ALL the time because its exposed to the elements.
 
  #3  
Old 05-17-2006, 08:45 PM
EMonz57's Avatar
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 12,084
Default RE: Short Ram vs. Cold Air

Injen cold air is my vote.

a cold air can be taken apart and made a short ram in 5 minutes and put back to cold air in 5 minutes so you change it as needed and you can have the best of both
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Elboy29
2nd Generation
6
07-11-2008 09:40 AM
lillben07
Intake, Headers and Exhaust
5
06-16-2008 02:09 PM
SpeedyRed85
Intake, Headers and Exhaust
23
06-23-2007 12:02 AM
Nemesis
Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Sportback
3
05-30-2007 09:12 PM
kniel023
Intake, Headers and Exhaust
3
12-28-2006 12:51 AM



Quick Reply: Short Ram vs. Cold Air



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:52 AM.