Intake, Headers and Exhaust Custom Exhaust? New Headers? Need Opinions on Intakes? Discuss making your ride breathe better here.
View Poll Results: A poll
AEM Cold Air Intake
66.67%
AEM Short Ram Air Intake
33.33%
Voters: 3. You may not vote on this poll

Short Ram vs. Cold Air

Old May 17, 2006 | 01:17 PM
  #1  
2000_4G64's Avatar
Thread Starter
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2
Default Short Ram vs. Cold Air

looking for some added performance and a better sound out of the stock 2.4L but I'm a student and can't decide whether or not its worht the extra $$$ for the full cold air... obviously better performance out of the cold air, but what is the best bang for my buck?
 
Old May 17, 2006 | 08:32 PM
  #2  
DixonsGst's Avatar
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 186
Default RE: Short Ram vs. Cold Air

cold air is better but i doubt your going to actually feel a power difference. If your on a budget just go with short ram. The down fall with cold air intakes is you have to change the filter ALL the time because its exposed to the elements.
 
Old May 17, 2006 | 08:45 PM
  #3  
EMonz57's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 12,084
Default RE: Short Ram vs. Cold Air

Injen cold air is my vote.

a cold air can be taken apart and made a short ram in 5 minutes and put back to cold air in 5 minutes so you change it as needed and you can have the best of both
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Elboy29
2nd Generation
6
Jul 11, 2008 09:40 AM
lillben07
Intake, Headers and Exhaust
5
Jun 16, 2008 02:09 PM
SpeedyRed85
Intake, Headers and Exhaust
23
Jun 23, 2007 12:02 AM
Nemesis
Mitsubishi Lancer and Lancer Sportback
3
May 30, 2007 09:12 PM
kniel023
Intake, Headers and Exhaust
3
Dec 28, 2006 12:51 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:16 AM.