Mitsubishi Outlander The new crossover from Mitsubishi, mixing the usefulness of an SUV with the size and convenience of a sport wagon.

Rear suspension on 2.4L for towing

Old May 16, 2012 | 06:35 PM
  #1  
orleboat's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5
From: Montréal, QC, Canada
Default Rear suspension on 2.4L for towing

Hi everybody
I've been looking since a while for an anwser but no luck.

I own a 2010 outlander ES 4Wd 2.4L (canadian) Is it possible that the rear suspension is not the same on the V6 model? I have MacPherson strut on the rear and it seem that V6 have Coil and strut separate. Is that true??

I want to use it to tow a pop up camping trailer. But has soon has i put the trailer on, the hitch almost it the ground, i know trailer is 250lbs tongue weight.(I know that 150lbs is the limit with 4cyl. but the hitch is a 400/4000 and im sure the body is the same...V6 or not) Imagine now with the familly and cargo inside.

Max payload is 827lbs (same has my Lancer..) and i can't put the air spring like firestone on it, to raise it a bit, since they do not realy fit in there...

Shoud i change my spring for the one of the 7 passengers?? (Payload is 1157lbs) or there is more than only spring difference??

Thanks to all who replies
 
Old May 17, 2012 | 07:59 AM
  #2  
Claude_A's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 481
From: Montreal area, Quebec, Canada
Default

McPherson in front. Multi-link in back.
All models since 2007. The Firestone bag will work. Just have a look behind one of the rear wheel.
 
Old May 17, 2012 | 04:15 PM
  #3  
orleboat's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5
From: Montréal, QC, Canada
Default

Thanks for the reply.
I looked at my rear suspension and it definitly does not look like the picture you sent me. But more like this.. (sorry could not find a bigger picture).
Its why i'm pretty sur firestone bag does not fit or if stronger springs exist, and if they can be installed without changing any other parts.
 
Attached Thumbnails Rear suspension on 2.4L for towing-sans-titre.jpg  
Old May 17, 2012 | 07:13 PM
  #4  
Claude_A's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 481
From: Montreal area, Quebec, Canada
Default

I am confused, all my sources of info give the same rear layout for the 4cyl as the v6 BUT if I go to 2010 MITSUBISHI OUTLANDER Parts - Mitsubishi Parts | OEM Mitsubishi Parts | Genuine Mitsubishi Parts see below.

The 4 cyls has a McPherson rear suspension. A North American only deal?????
I am happy I took the v6. But for you the bag will not fit...
 
Old May 18, 2012 | 03:06 PM
  #5  
orleboat's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5
From: Montréal, QC, Canada
Default

Thanks,
Me i regret a bit i did not pick the V6...
But i didn't knew when i bought it, that i will get a pop up trailer that heavy...
The lost of money is to big to change it now, i will use it like that... or maybe add some Weight distribution bar...

Thanks again
 
Old May 19, 2012 | 10:56 AM
  #6  
tcp's Avatar
tcp
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 478
From:
Default Weight Distribution

Adding a weight distributing system would make a lot of difference, but make sure your trailer tongue can handle the added stress of such a system. Many PUP trailers aren't strong enough in the A-frame to handle it and will bend. Check with the manufacturer to be sure.

PS. I find it extremely strange that they went with a different rear suspension on the 2.4.


Originally Posted by orleboat
Thanks,
Me i regret a bit i did not pick the V6...
But i didn't knew when i bought it, that i will get a pop up trailer that heavy...
The lost of money is to big to change it now, i will use it like that... or maybe add some Weight distribution bar...

Thanks again
 
Old May 22, 2012 | 10:08 AM
  #7  
azjake's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 575
From:
Default

Please keep this in mind. It's not just the suspension that allows you to haul more in the V6. You also have a more robust transmission (vs the CVT) and 62 more HP in the V6 vs the 4cyl.
 
Old May 24, 2012 | 02:01 AM
  #8  
ivanz's Avatar
Senior Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 626
From: Vancouver, Canada
Default

Likewise, much more low end torque, extra transmission cooler, and much better engine braking as well. Even with that, I still wouldn't recommend towing anything serious with the V6 Outlander on mountainous areas.
 
Old May 24, 2012 | 01:40 PM
  #9  
orleboat's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Junior Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 5
From: Montréal, QC, Canada
Default

I read many times on forums that 2.4l engine and cvt can tow up to 330/3300lbs in other coutries. I don't know if it's a matter of warranty, in north america its 10years and maybe they don't want you to break it before that.

So i'm sure it can handle it, i'm not towing every day and i'm not in a mountainous area.. i have brake on the trailer and i installed the 7 pin connector plus a proportionnal brake controller so i should be ok with that, If i go somewhere with to much hills, i'll borrow the truck of my father in-law.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RamZet
Suspension
3
Oct 17, 2006 02:31 AM
bud660r
Suspension
1
Sep 11, 2006 10:54 AM
xtreme49
Mitsubishi Galant
2
Jun 20, 2006 11:54 PM
nice4g64
Mitsubishi Galant
5
Dec 23, 2005 10:40 PM
outlancer
Mitsubishi Outlander
5
Nov 3, 2005 06:27 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:14 AM.