2nd Generation This includes all Eclipses, and Talons built from 1995-1999

WHICH COST MORE AN ENGINE REBUILT OR A USED

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 03-03-2007, 02:26 AM
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,290
Default RE: WHICH COST MORE AN ENGINE REBUILT OR A USED

ORIGINAL: Joshewuhh

Its a 1997 gs 2.0L no turbo
Its a 420A, nota 4g63.
Replace it.
just as i previously stated.
 
  #12  
Old 03-03-2007, 04:32 AM
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,387
Default RE: WHICH COST MORE AN ENGINE REBUILT OR A USED

replace it. Junk yards are full of those lame *** engines.....errr i mean....
 
  #13  
Old 03-03-2007, 09:45 AM
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location:
Posts: 1,026
Default RE: WHICH COST MORE AN ENGINE REBUILT OR A USED

I bet ya its #1 rod spun the bearing.
 
  #14  
Old 03-03-2007, 10:31 AM
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location:
Posts: 716
Default RE: WHICH COST MORE AN ENGINE REBUILT OR A USED

just replace it. its cheaper than a rebuild.
Not that the parts are going to be that expensive to buy, but if you have a bad rod bearing, then the crank is probably pitted, and scared beyond what a machine shop can fix, in that case you are looking at alot more money, not to mention the headache of getting the motor cleaned properly, everything installed properlly, and then bolted back in, everything adjusted properly, and then making it run. Thats alot of work bro. Something I wouldnt trust any shop to do.
So if you cant do it yourself, then I say just buy a used motor, and throw it in.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ce_wood
Mitsubishi Montero & Montero Sport
3
11-25-2017 06:25 PM
YonkersMitsuJoe
For Sale / Trade
0
07-06-2006 03:27 PM
antomx
For Sale / Trade
2
09-13-2004 11:17 PM



Quick Reply: WHICH COST MORE AN ENGINE REBUILT OR A USED



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:51 AM.