I have an aging outlander (2007 XLS) with 135k miles, and it's noticeably not driving as well as it used to. Bumps and cracks in the road are harsh, torque steer is prevalent in FWD mode. Also, the steering seems to follow ruts and bumps around the road more than before.

My shocks/struts don't seem to show the obvious signs of failure, but I'm thinking at least the rear shocks need to be replaced, as the rear end seems to sag a bit, and it bottoms out often over speed bumps. I think this might help with the torque steer, as new rear shocks would eliminate sag and get the front end connected better to the road.

I know Serpentor and Ccernst have high-mileage Outlanders about the same age. What have owners replaced on older Outlanders to improve ride quality?

 

What I've researched just points to replacing shocks and/or struts and/or springs. I had everything inspected and nothing has failed. It's just worn parts.

I'm pretty sure I will start with the rear due to cost. Will I get the most bang for my buck replacing rear springs or the shocks? Or should I do both? It seems the springs are what carry the load and would cause any sag. These springs are apparently a dealer-only part.

 

You are correct the shocks could use a change, while an obvious blown shock could be oily,
a shock starts wearing the day it is installed and slowly gives out. Oily appearance is only the ultimate failure.

For a heavy car like the outlander is not like a lancer or civic therefore you can expect shocks be worn out before 200K. If your rear suspension has separate springs from the shocks then it should be an easy change.

The other things can be control arms, especially front control arms, the bushings can wear out so over ruts of the road the wheel moves more to follow it, causing tracking issue. You can look into replacing the 2 lower control arms or bushings, if available separately.